×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Sixth Circuit: State Court Committed Constitutional Error in Applying Ohio Rules of Evidence 606(B) to Deny Right to Fair Trial
Loaded on June 15, 2021
by Dale Chappell
published in Criminal Legal News
July, 2021, page 33
Filed under:
Admissions.
Location:
Ohio.
by Dale Chappell
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that the state courts’ application of Ohio Rules of Evidence 606(B) constituted constitutional error, providing an avenue for federal habeas corpus relief.
After Abulay Nian was convicted of rape in an Ohio court, he moved for a ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Criminal Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- Deliberately Convicting the Innocent: Exonerations Expose the Criminal Justice System’s Callous Indifference Toward Official Misconduct, by Douglas Ankney
- Tenth Circuit: District Courts Have Authority to Decide What Constitutes ‘Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons’ for Compassionate Release After First Step Act, by Dale Chappell
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals: Warrantless Arrest Designed to Elicit a Confession Constitutes Flagrant Misconduct Requiring Suppression of Confession, by Douglas Ankney
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court: Failure to Object to Improper Jury Instruction and Curative Instruction by Court Containing ‘Freudian Slip’ Constitutes IAC, by Anthony Accurso
- Federal Habeas Corpus: Discovery and Expanding the Record, by Dale Chappell
- Illinois Supreme Court Announces Person Seeking Certificate of Innocence Need Only Prove Innocence of Originally Prosecuted Theory of Offense, not Every Conceivable Theory, by Matthew Clarke
- An Ignoble Process How High-Pressure Tactics and Flawed Investigative Techniques Created a Miscarriage of Justice, by Casey Bastian
- Inflation Increases Likelihood of Felony Theft Charges, by David Reutter
- Report Shows Cellphone Searches Common, by Jayson Hawkins
- Iowa Supreme Court: Successful Adjustment to Sex Offender Registry Requirements Not a Reason to Deny Modification, by David Reutter
- California Court of Appeal: Defendant Cannot Be Convicted of Robbery and Kidnapping to Commit Robbery for Same Act, by Anthony Accurso
- Alaska Supreme Court: ‘Set Aside’ Conviction From 1997 Is Not ‘Conviction’ Triggering Lifetime ASORA Registration, by Anthony Accurso
- Discredited New York Police Detective’s False Testimony Causes the Dismissal of Close to 100 Drug Convictions, by Derek Gilna
- Eleventh Circuit: Timely Filed Amended Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850 Motion Tolls AEDPA Clock, Rejects State’s Proposed 30-Day Limitations Period, by Dale Chappell
- Ninth Circuit Joins Five Other Circuits in Holding § 1B1.13 Doesn’t Apply to Compassionate Release Motions by Prisoners, by Dale Chappell
- Cancel Culture Nothing New to Those on Sex Offense Registries, by Sandy Rozek
- North Carolina Governor Announces Formation of Juvenile Sentence Review Board, by Douglas Ankney
- The Era of Punitive Excess The criminal justice system is marred by an overreliance on excessive punishment, by Bruce Western, Jeremy Travis
- Tenth Circuit: Warrantless Search of Truck Driver’s Home Not Justified Solely by Connection to Alien Smuggling, by Anthony Accurso
- Sixth Circuit: State Court Committed Constitutional Error in Applying Ohio Rules of Evidence 606(B) to Deny Right to Fair Trial, by Dale Chappell
- Direct Collateral Review Creates Path Around AEDPA Hurdles for State Prisoners Seeking Postconviction Relief, by Dale Chappell
- Maine Supreme Court: Counsel’s Introduction of Victim’s Video Interview with Police Was Not ‘Sound Trial Strategy,’ Constituted IAC, by Dale Chappell
- D.C. Circuit: Conflicted Counsel During Habeas Proceeding Requires Appointment of Conflict-Free Counsel, by David Reutter
- Mississippi Supreme Court Reverses Conviction due to Double Jeopardy Violation Because of Mistrial Without Manifest Necessity in Initial Trial, by Matthew Clarke
- Wyoming Supreme Court Abandons Alter Ego Rule in Relation to Defense-of-Another Claim, by Anthony Accurso
- California Court of Appeal: § 3051’s Exclusion of One Strike Offenders from Youthful Offender Parole Hearings Violates Equal Protection, by Douglas Ankney
- Seventh Circuit: Knowing and Intelligent Waiver of Miranda Rights Distinct and Separate Issue From Whether Statement Was Voluntary, by Douglas Ankney
- Fifth Circuit: U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13 Policy Statement Not Applicable to Prisoner’s Motion for Compassionate Release, by Douglas Ankney
- Illinois Supreme Court: Motion to Suppress Statements Granted Where Police Prolonged Traffic Stop to Investigate Offenses Unrelated to the Stop, by Douglas Ankney
- Baltimore and St. Louis ‘Shoot Down’ Spy Planes, by Douglas Ankney
- First Circuit: Government’s Mention of Co-Defendant’s Guilty Plea Before Jury Was Confrontation Clause Violation Warranting New Trial, by Anthony Accurso
- SCOTUS Reaffirms Habeas Court Must Consider Entire Record Before ‘Disturbing’ a State Criminal Judgment, by Dale Chappell
- West Virginia Supreme Court: Emergency Protective Order Not De Facto Search Warrant, by Douglas Ankney
- Report: U.S. Border Patrol Not Nearly as Nice as It Claims, by Edward Lyon
- Potentially Deadly War Gas Deployed Against Black Lives Matter Protesters, by Matthew Clarke
- Tenth Circuit Joins Other Circuits, Holds § 1B1.13 Does Not Apply to Compassionate Release Motions Filed by Prisoners, by Dale Chappell
- Kentucky Supreme Court: Blood Test Refusal Inadmissible as Evidence in DUI Case Even to Explain Why Prosecution Has No Scientific Evidence of Intoxication, by Matthew Clarke
- News in Brief
More from Dale Chappell:
- The Death of the Savings Clause, May 15, 2024
- Federal Habeas Corpus: Understanding Second or Successive Petitions for State Prisoners, April 15, 2024
- Fourth Circuit Reinstates Relief From Death Penalty, Citing State’s Forfeiture of Argument Against Relief, May 15, 2023
- Federal Habeas Corpus: The Evidentiary Hearing for Federal Prisoners, April 15, 2023
- Federal Habeas Corpus: How to Raise a Fourth Amendment Claim, Feb. 15, 2023
- Will Overturning Roe v. Wade Kill the Right to Abortion Under BOP Policy?, Jan. 1, 2023
- Federal Habeas Corpus: How to Raise an Actual Innocence Claim, Dec. 15, 2022
- Federal Habeas Corpus: Role of the Magistrate Judge, Nov. 15, 2022
- Federal Habeas Corpus: Obtaining Habeas Relief After a Guilty Plea, Oct. 15, 2022
- Government Snitches Rake in Millions as Their Testimony Is the Leading Cause of Wrongful Convictions, Sept. 15, 2022
More from these topics:
- U.S. v. McGee, No. 98-3063 (7th Cir.) (189 F.3d 626) (September 1, 1999) (Judge Kenneth F. Ripple), Nov. 1, 1999. Punch And Jurists, Admissions.
- U.S. v. Davis, No. 93-3059 (D.C. Cir.) (181 F.3d 147) (July 13, 1999) (Per Curiam), Aug. 1, 1999. Punch And Jurists, Admissions.
- U.S. v. Zizzo, No. 95-1643 (7th Cir.) (120 F.3d 1338) (July 29, 1997) (Judge Terrence T. Evans), Sept. 1, 1997. Punch And Jurists, Admissions.
- U.S. v. Zizzo, No. 95-1643 (7th Cir.) (120 F.3d 1338) (July 29, 1997) (Judge Terrence T. Evans), Sept. 1, 1997. Punch And Jurists, Admissions.
- U.S. v. Jinadu, No. 95-3833 (6th Cir.) (98 F.3d 239) (October 17, 1996) (Judge Leroy J. Jr. Contie), Nov. 1, 1996. Punch And Jurists, Admissions.
