Skip navigation
PYHS - Header

Prison Legal News v. Lewis County, Complaint, 2014

Download original document:
Brief thumbnail
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
Case 3:14-cv-05304-JRC Document 1 Filed 04/11/14 Page 1 of 13

1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

7
8
9

PRISON LEGAL NEWS, a project of the
HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER,

No.
COMPLAINT

10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
13
14
15
16

LEWIS COUNTY; LEWIS COUNTY
SHERIFF'S OFFICE; STEVE MANSFIELD,
individually and in his capacity as Lewis
County Sheriff; KEVIN HANSON, individually
and in his capacity as Lewis County Jail
Administrator; and JIM PEA, individually and
in his capacity as Lewis County Administrative
Lieutenant,
Defendants.

17
18

I.

19
20

1.1

NATURE OF THE CASE

Plaintiff Prison Legal News brings this action to enjoin Defendants’ censorship of

21

mail sent to and from prisoners held in custody at the Lewis County Jail without notice and an

22

opportunity to appeal, in violation of the First Amendment and of the Fourteenth Amendment’s

23

Due Process Clause. Defendants have adopted and implemented written mail policies and

24

practices that unconstitutionally: restrict correspondence to and from prisoners to postcards only;

25

prohibit delivery of book catalogs to prisoners; and do not afford adequate due process. In this

26

action, PLN seeks a preliminary and permanent injunction, damages, and a declaration that

27

Defendants’ policies and conduct violate the Constitution.
COMPLAINT - 1

9870.14 hd106701

MACDONALD HOAGUE & BAYLESS
705 Second Avenue, Suite 1500
Seattle, Washington 98104
Tel 206.622.1604 Fax 206.343.3961

Case 3:14-cv-05304-JRC Document 1 Filed 04/11/14 Page 2 of 13

II.

1
2

2.1

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

This action arises under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United

3

States Constitution. This Court has jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343,

4

2201, and 2202.

5

2.2

Venue is proper in the Western District of Washington under 28 U.S.C.

6

§ 1391(b)(2) because a substantial part of the events complained of occurred in this District, and

7

because the Defendants reside in this District.
III.

8
9

3.1

PARTIES

Plaintiff Prison Legal News (PLN) is a project of the Human Rights Defense

10

Center (HRDC), a Washington Non-Profit Corporation. The core of HRDC’s mission is public

11

education, prisoner education, advocacy, and outreach in support of the rights of prisoners and in

12

furtherance of basic human rights. PLN publishes and distributes a monthly journal of

13

corrections news and analysis as well as books about the criminal justice system and legal issues

14

affecting prisoners, to prisoners, lawyers, courts, libraries, and the public throughout the

15

Country. PLN also maintains a website (www.prisonlegalnews.org) and operates an email list.

16

Prisoners of all types, family and friends of prisoners, prisoner advocates, and other members of

17

the general public are among the intended beneficiaries of PLN’s activities.

18
19
20

3.2

Defendant Lewis County is a municipal corporation formed under the laws of the

State of Washington.
3.3

Defendant Lewis County Sheriff’s Office is a department of Lewis County and

21

operates the Lewis County Jail located in Chehalis, Washington. The Jail has the capacity to

22

house 356 prisoners. In 2012, it averaged 211 prisoners per day, 28% of whom were Contract

23

Bed Inmates, meaning that Lewis County confined them for another government entity. In 2012,

24

the Jail brought in close to $1.3 million in revenue collected from confining contract inmates. In

25

2008, 5,110 prisoners were processed through the Lewis County Jail.

26
27

3.4

Defendant Steve Mansfield is the Sheriff of Lewis County. Sheriff Mansfield is

employed by and is an agent of Lewis County and the Sheriff’s Office. He is responsible for the
COMPLAINT - 2

9870.14 hd106701

MACDONALD HOAGUE & BAYLESS
705 Second Avenue, Suite 1500
Seattle, Washington 98104
Tel 206.622.1604 Fax 206.343.3961

Case 3:14-cv-05304-JRC Document 1 Filed 04/11/14 Page 3 of 13

1

operations of the Sheriff’s Office and the Lewis County Jail, and the training and supervision of

2

the Jail staff who interprets and implements the Jail’s mail policy for prisoners. He is the

3

policymaker for the Jail policy governing mail for prisoners.

4

3.5

Defendant Kevin Hanson is a member of the Command Staff of the Lewis County

5

Sheriff’s Office, and is the Jail Administrator of the Lewis County Jail. He is employed by and

6

is an agent of Lewis County and the Sheriff’s Office. As Jail Administrator, he is responsible for

7

the operations of the jail, the training and supervision of Jail Staff, and implementing and

8

enforcing the Jail’s mail policies and practices.

9

3.6

Defendant Jim Pea is the Administrative Lieutenant of the Lewis County Jail. As

10

the Administrative Lieutenant, he is responsible for making the final decision regarding

11

censorship of incoming and outgoing mail.

12

3.7

Each of the acts and omissions of the persons alleged herein were taken under

13

color of state law and within the scope of their official duties as employees, officers, or agents of

14

Lewis County and the Lewis County Sheriff’s Office.
IV.

15
16

4.1

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

Prison Legal News publishes and distributes a soft-cover monthly journal, book

17

catalogs, informational brochures, and book offers, and publishes and distributes paperback

18

books, about the criminal justice system and legal issues affecting prisoners. PLN also

19

distributes by mail legal opinions and other correspondence to prisoners incarcerated in various

20

correctional facilities across the country.

21

4.2

Prison Legal News has thousands of subscribers in the United States and abroad,

22

including prisoners in more than 2,000 federal, state, and local correctional facilities across the

23

United States, attorneys, journalists, public libraries, judges, and other members of the public.

24

PLN publications are distributed without incident to prisoners and law librarians in the vast

25

majority of correctional facilities across the United States, including the most secure facilities of

26

the Federal Bureau of Prisons, the Washington Department of Corrections and many other

27

States, and other jails and detention facilities in Washington and across the nation.
COMPLAINT - 3

9870.14 hd106701

MACDONALD HOAGUE & BAYLESS
705 Second Avenue, Suite 1500
Seattle, Washington 98104
Tel 206.622.1604 Fax 206.343.3961

Case 3:14-cv-05304-JRC Document 1 Filed 04/11/14 Page 4 of 13

4.3

1

Prison Legal News engages in core protected speech and expressive conduct on

2

matters of public concern, such as operations of prison facilities, prison conditions, prisoner

3

health and safety, and prisoners’ rights.

4

A.

CENSORSHIP AND LACK OF DUE PROCESS
Incoming Mail

5
6

4.4

Defendants have rejected Prison Legal News’s book catalogs, book offers,

7

informational brochures, subscription forms, and copies of court rulings mailed to prisoners held

8

in custody at the Lewis County Jail. The mail items rejected by Defendants include, but are not

9

limited to, the items identified below.
Informational Brochures, Subscription Order Forms, Book Catalogs

10
11
12
13

4.5

Prison Legal News sent informational brochures about PLN and subscription

order forms, book catalogs, and book offers to prisoners at the Lewis County Jail.
4.6

Prison Legal News Brochure and Subscription Order Form: Prison Legal

14

News sent certain prisoners at the Lewis County Jail an informational brochure about its

15

organization and publications. The double-sided single-page brochure includes: a description of

16

the topics covered in PLN’s monthly journal, subscription rates, special subscription offers, and

17

an order form; a description of three books available for purchase or included with a subscription

18

to Prison Legal News—Protecting Your Health & Safety, With Liberty for Some: 500 Years of

19

Imprisonment in America, and Prison Profiteers: Who Makes Money from Mass Incarceration;

20

and other information about PLN’s bookstore.

21

4.7

Book Catalog: Prison Legal News sent certain prisoners at the Lewis County Jail

22

its PLN Book List. The double-sided single-page book list includes a description of 33 books,

23

dictionaries, and resource materials available for purchase. The books available for purchase

24

include information about a variety of topics, including but not limited to: the basic rights of

25

prisoners regarding health and safety; the American criminal justice system; self-representation

26

in court; developing a successful re-entry plan upon release from prison; searching for a job;

27

crime and poverty; the mental health crisis in U.S. prisons and jails; preparation for the GED
COMPLAINT - 4

9870.14 hd106701

MACDONALD HOAGUE & BAYLESS
705 Second Avenue, Suite 1500
Seattle, Washington 98104
Tel 206.622.1604 Fax 206.343.3961

Case 3:14-cv-05304-JRC Document 1 Filed 04/11/14 Page 5 of 13

1

test; how to write letters to government agencies and officials; and how to support family

2

members facing criminal charges.
4.8

3

Book Offers: Prison Legal News sent certain prisoners at the Lewis County Jail a

4

double-sided single-page informational brochure about two books for sale: The Habeas

5

Citebook: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, a handbook containing case citations, pleadings, and

6

forms designed to help a prisoner seek habeas corpus relief; and Prisoners’ Guerrilla Handbook

7

to Correspondence Programs in the United States and Canada, a handbook on high school,

8

vocational, paralegal, undergraduate, and graduate courses available through correspondence

9

study.

10
11
12
13
14
15

4.9

Collectively, the PLN Brochure, Book List, and Book Offer described above in

Paragraphs 4.6 through 4.8 are referred to as “Informational Brochure Packs” below.
4.10

Prison Legal News sent all of the Informational Brochure Packs in white standard

#10 envelopes via first-class mail.
4.11

Prison Legal News mailed Informational Brochure Packs addressed to each of the

following prisoners at the Lewis County Jail on or about the following dates:
4.11.1 Prisoner Name
Norman Jay Field
Yahdriel Euteast Jones
Jennifer Christine Lantau
Steven Michael Ledoux
Ashley Leanna Leonard
Harvey Clem Maddux
Jonathon Manual Margart
Brandt Daniel McKenna
Corey Ross Morgan
Johnathan Adam O’Connor
Rodney Dee Oleachea
Kristy Ann Price-Alvarez
Jerrell Scott Redmill
Howard Eugene Ross
Curtis James Rudolph
Diaz Guadalupe Solis
Michael Troy Taylor
Eric Dale Waller
Joshua Ryan O’Neil Whittler
Clifton Roy Young

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Date Mailed to Prisoner
October 8, 2013
September 13, 2013
September 13, 2013
September 13, 2013
October 8, 2013
October 8, 2013
September 13, 2013
September 13, 2013
October 8, 2013
September 17, 2013
September 17, 2013
October 8, 2013
September 17, 2013
September 17, 2013
October 11, 2013
September 17, 2013
October 11, 2013
October 11, 2013
September 17, 2013
October 11, 2013

27
COMPLAINT - 5

9870.14 hd106701

MACDONALD HOAGUE & BAYLESS
705 Second Avenue, Suite 1500
Seattle, Washington 98104
Tel 206.622.1604 Fax 206.343.3961

Case 3:14-cv-05304-JRC Document 1 Filed 04/11/14 Page 6 of 13

4.11.2 Prisoner Name
Damon Keith Burgess
Roy Alan Dever
4.11.3 Prisoner Name
Dominic Lee Combs
4.11.4 Prisoner Name
Bonny Ray Jr. Anderson
Zachery Bynum

1
2
3
4
5

Date Mailed to Prisoner
October 4, 2013
October 4, 2013
Date Mailed to Prisoner
October 4, 2013
Date Mailed to Prisoner
October 4, 2013
October 4, 2013

6

The prisoners identified above were prisoners at the Lewis County Jail at the time that the Jail

7

received the Informational Brochure Packs addressed to each prisoner from PLN.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

4.12

Defendants rejected each Informational Brochure Pack identified in paragraphs

4.11.1 to 4.11.4 and did not deliver them to the prisoner-addressees. Defendants returned each
item of mail to PLN unopened.
4.13

By rejecting the Informational Brochure Packs, Defendants interfered with PLN’s

protected free speech rights.
4.14

By rejecting the Informational Brochure Packs, Defendants interfered with the

prisoner-addressees’ protected free speech rights.
4.15

For the Informational Brochure Packs listed above in Paragraph 4.11.1, the Jail

16

stamped the mail “RETURN TO SENDER This facility accepts postcards only.” The Jail did

17

not provide PLN any information about a right to appeal the censorship decision.

18

4.16

For the Informational Brochure Packs listed above in Paragraph 4.11.2, the Jail

19

stamped the mail “Returned to Sender REASON CHECKED BELOW.” The reason

20

“Unauthorized Mail” was circled or checked by the Jail on both envelopes. The Jail did not

21

provide PLN any information about a right to appeal the censorship decision.

22

4.17

For the Informational Brochure Packs listed above in Paragraph 4.11.4, the Jail

23

stamped the mail “RETURN TO SENDER This facility accepts postcards only” and “Returned

24

to Sender REASON CHECKED BELOW.” (Emphasis added). No boxes were checked, but

25

“Unauthorized Mail” was circled by the Jail. The Jail did not provide PLN any information

26

about a right to appeal the censorship decision.

27
COMPLAINT - 6

9870.14 hd106701

MACDONALD HOAGUE & BAYLESS
705 Second Avenue, Suite 1500
Seattle, Washington 98104
Tel 206.622.1604 Fax 206.343.3961

Case 3:14-cv-05304-JRC Document 1 Filed 04/11/14 Page 7 of 13

1

4.18

Defendants failed to provide due process notice to PLN of the reason for rejecting

2

PLN’s Informational Brochure Pack by, among other inadequacies, failing to identify the

3

specific mail policy they relied on, and stating different reasons for censoring identical mail.

4

Defendants also failed to provide PLN with any notice of or opportunities to be heard to

5

challenge the censorship decisions.

6

4.19

Defendants failed to provide due process notice to PLN of the reason for rejecting

7

PLN’s Informational Brochure Pack by, among other inadequacies, failing to explain the basis

8

for their censorship decisions, failing to identify the specific mail policy they relied on, stating

9

different reasons for censoring identical items of mail, and otherwise failing to give meaningful

10

notice of the censorship. Defendants also failed to provide PLN with any notice of the procedure

11

by which senders of censored mail might challenge the censorship decisions.

12

4.20

On information and belief, Defendants fail to provide due process notice and an

13

opportunity to appeal to other senders of censored mail addressed to prisoners at the Lewis

14

County Jail.

15

4.21

On information and belief, Defendants fail to provide any notice to the prisoner-

16

addressees that the Jail censored PLN’s mail. Defendants also fail to provide the prisoner-

17

addressees with any notice of or opportunity to be heard to challenge the censorship decisions.

18
19

4.22

prisoners at the Lewis County Jail.
Court Opinions

20
21

Prison Legal News intends to continue sending Informational Brochure Packs to

4.23

On October 15, 2013, Prison Legal News mailed copies of the Ninth Circuit Court

22

of Appeals opinion in Clement v. California Dept. of Corr., 364 F.3d 1148 (9th Cir. 2004),

23

addressed to each of the following prisoners at the Lewis County Jail:

24

Prisoner Name
Brendon Laverne Amos
Bonny Ray Jr. Anderson
Brian Leon Austen
Terry Lee Bryan
Damon Keith Burgess
Zachery Howard Bynum

25
26
27
COMPLAINT - 7

9870.14 hd106701

MACDONALD HOAGUE & BAYLESS
705 Second Avenue, Suite 1500
Seattle, Washington 98104
Tel 206.622.1604 Fax 206.343.3961

Case 3:14-cv-05304-JRC Document 1 Filed 04/11/14 Page 8 of 13

Roy Alan Dever
Norman Jay Field
Ronald Joe Gleason
Stephen Lavale Hardy
Yahdriel Euteast Jones
Jennifer Christine Lantau
Steven Michael Ledoux
Harvey Clem Maddux
Jonathan Manual Margart
Kristy Ann Price-Alvarez
Howard Eugene Ross
Jerrell Scott Redmill
Guadalupe Solis-Diaz
Joshua Ryan O’Neil Wittler

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

4.24

Prison Legal News sent each of the Ninth Circuit opinions in white standard # 10

envelopes via first-class mail. Defendants returned each item of mail to PLN unopened.
4.25

Defendants rejected each Court Opinion identified in paragraph 4.23 and did not

deliver them to the prisoner-addressees.
4.26

By rejecting the Court Opinions, Defendants interfered with PLN’s protected free

speech rights.
4.27

By rejecting the Court Opinions, Defendants interfered with the prisoner-

addressees’ protected free speech rights.
4.28

For the Court Opinions listed above in Paragraph 4.23, the Jail stamped the mail

18

“RETURN TO SENDER This facility accepts postcards only.” The Jail did not provide PLN

19

any information about its right to appeal the censorship decision.

20

4.29

Defendants failed to provide due process notice to PLN of the reason for rejecting

21

PLN’s mail by, among other inadequacies, failing to identify the specific mail policy that

22

Defendants relied on. Defendants also failed to provide PLN with any notice of or opportunities

23

to be heard to challenge the censorship decisions.

24

4.30

On information and belief, Defendants fail to provide due process notice and an

25

opportunity to appeal to other senders of censored mail addressed to prisoners at the Lewis

26

County Jail.

27
COMPLAINT - 8

9870.14 hd106701

MACDONALD HOAGUE & BAYLESS
705 Second Avenue, Suite 1500
Seattle, Washington 98104
Tel 206.622.1604 Fax 206.343.3961

Case 3:14-cv-05304-JRC Document 1 Filed 04/11/14 Page 9 of 13

1

4.31

On information and belief, Defendants failed to provide any notice to the

2

prisoner-addressees that the Jail censored PLN’s mail. Defendants also failed to provide the

3

prisoner-addressees with any notice of or opportunity to be heard to challenge the censorship

4

decisions.

5
6
7

4.32

Prison Legal News intends to continue sending copies of Court Opinions to

prisoners at the Lewis County Jail.
4.33

By banning incoming mail that is not in postcard form, Defendants have

8

interfered with the free speech rights of other publishers and correspondents who have attempted

9

to or want to correspond with prisoners at the Lewis County Jail.
Outgoing Mail

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

4.34

Lewis County Jail prisoners want to send letters and other correspondence to non-

prisoners and entities outside the Jail.
4.35

On information and belief, prisoners incarcerated at Lewis County Jail want to

send publication order forms and other non-postcard correspondence to Prison Legal News.
4.36

Since at least February 3, 2010, Defendants have banned prisoners from sending

outgoing letters and other correspondence not in postcard form.
4.37

By banning outgoing mail not in postcard form, Defendants have deterred

18

prisoners from exercising their free speech rights to communicate with family, friends, persons

19

acting as their power of attorney, counselors, clergy, employers, prospective employers, financial

20

institutions, public agencies, schools, and newspapers.

21
22
23
24
25
26

4.38

By banning outgoing mail not in postcard form, Defendants have interfered with

the prisoners’ protected free speech rights.
4.39

By banning outgoing mail that is not in postcard form, Defendants interfered with

the intended or potential recipients’ protected free speech rights, including PLN’s rights.
4.40

On information and belief, when rejecting outgoing mail that is not in postcard

form, Defendants failed to provide constitutionally adequate notice to the prisoner, and failed to

27
COMPLAINT - 9

9870.14 hd106701

MACDONALD HOAGUE & BAYLESS
705 Second Avenue, Suite 1500
Seattle, Washington 98104
Tel 206.622.1604 Fax 206.343.3961

Case 3:14-cv-05304-JRC Document 1 Filed 04/11/14 Page 10 of 13

1

provide the prisoner with any notice of or opportunity to be heard to challenge the censorship

2

decisions.
4.41

3

On information and belief, when rejecting outgoing mail that is not in postcard

4

form, Defendants failed to provide constitutionally adequate notice to the intended recipient, and

5

failed to provide the intended recipient with any notice of or opportunity to be heard to challenge

6

the censorship decisions.

7

B.

8
9

JAIL POLICIES
4.42

outgoing inmate mail.” Exhibit A is a true copy of the Lewis County Jail Policy.
4.42.1 This policy states, in pertinent part, “Incoming and outgoing personal mail

10
11

POL 05.07.050 is the Lewis County Jail policy that “applies to incoming and

shall be postcard media only.”
4.42.2 This policy requires notice for rejected incoming mail that contains

12
13

“contraband” by referring to a Notice of Withheld Material but does not describe the contents of

14

such Notice, provide an exemplar, or require notice of an opportunity to appeal the censorship

15

decision.

16

4.42.3 Although this policy requires written notice to the sender and inmate when

17

the Administrative Lieutenant authorizes restrictions of incoming or outgoing mail because he or

18

she deems mail “a threat to the legitimate penological interest of the facility,” the policy does not

19

describe the contents of the notice, how it differs from the Notice of Withheld Material, and in

20

what way a “threat” differs from “contraband.” Among other deficiencies, the policy requires

21

notice of a right to request a review but does not state it will be conducted by someone other than

22

the person who made the censorship decision.
4.42.4 Other than the provisions described above, this policy does not provide for

23
24

any due process notice or opportunity to be heard.

25

4.42.5 This policy mandates that Jail staff “impose disciplinary sanctions when

26

inmates violate or attempt to violate the mail policy.” This would include attempting to mail a

27

letter from Jail or requesting receipt of a letter in Jail.
COMPLAINT - 10

9870.14 hd106701

MACDONALD HOAGUE & BAYLESS
705 Second Avenue, Suite 1500
Seattle, Washington 98104
Tel 206.622.1604 Fax 206.343.3961

Case 3:14-cv-05304-JRC Document 1 Filed 04/11/14 Page 11 of 13

1

4.43

The Lewis County Sheriff Website states: “ALL INCOMING MAIL, WITH

2

THE EXCEPTION OF LEGAL MAIL, WILL NEED TO BE ON A POSTCARD.” Exhibit B is

3

a true copy of a printout of the Lewis County Sheriff’s Website stating this policy.
V.

4

CLAIM ALLEGATIONS

5

COUNT 1

6

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION

7

5.1

Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs.

8

5.2

The acts described above constitute violations of Plaintiff’s rights, the rights of

9

other correspondents who have attempted to or want to correspond with prisoners at the Lewis

10

County Jail, and the rights of prisoners confined at the Lewis County Jail, under the First

11

Amendment to the United States Constitution through 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

12
13
14

5.3

The acts described above have caused damages to Plaintiff, and will continue to

cause damage.
5.4

Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief against all Defendants in their

15

official capacities. Plaintiff seeks compensatory and nominal damages against all governmental

16

entities and against all individual Defendants in their individual capacities. Plaintiff seeks

17

punitive damages solely against the individual Defendants in their individual capacities.

18

COUNT 2

19

DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT

20

TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION

21

5.5

Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs.

22

5.6

The acts described above constitute violations of Plaintiff’s rights, the rights of

23

other correspondents who have attempted to or want to correspond with prisoners at the Lewis

24

County Jail, and the rights of prisoners confined at the Lewis County Jail, under the Fourteenth

25

Amendment to the United States Constitution through 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

26
27

5.7

The acts described above have caused damages to Plaintiff, and will continue to

cause damage.
COMPLAINT - 11

9870.14 hd106701

MACDONALD HOAGUE & BAYLESS
705 Second Avenue, Suite 1500
Seattle, Washington 98104
Tel 206.622.1604 Fax 206.343.3961

Case 3:14-cv-05304-JRC Document 1 Filed 04/11/14 Page 12 of 13

1

5.8

Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief against all Defendants in their

2

official capacities. Plaintiff seeks compensatory and nominal damages against all governmental

3

entities and against all individual Defendants in their individual capacities. Plaintiff seeks

4

punitive damages solely against the individual Defendants in their individual capacities.
VI.

5
6

6.1

INJUNCTION ALLEGATIONS

Plaintiff, and others, will continue to attempt to correspond with prisoners

7

confined by Defendants in the Lewis County Jail. Defendants’ unconstitutional policy, practices,

8

and customs are ongoing and continue to violate Plaintiff’s constitutional rights and the rights of

9

other correspondents and prisoners. There is no adequate remedy at law for these violations.

10

6.2

Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief prohibiting Defendants from: (1) refusing

11

to deliver or allow delivery of informational brochures, subscription forms, book catalogs, book

12

offers, court opinions, and any other correspondence from Prison Legal News and from other

13

correspondents; (2) censoring or rejecting mail on the ground that it is not in the form of a

14

postcard; (3) censoring or rejecting catalogs; and (4) censoring or rejecting mail without

15

affording due process of law.
VII.

16

REQUEST FOR RELIEF

17

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff requests relief as follows:

18

7.1

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

A preliminary injunction and a permanent injunction preventing Defendants from

continuing to violate the Constitution, and providing other equitable relief;
7.2

A declaration that Defendants’ policies, practices, and customs violate the

Constitution;
7.3

An award of nominal, compensatory, and punitive damages for each violation of

its First Amendment rights to free speech and expression in an amount to be proved at trial;
7.4

An award of nominal, compensatory, and punitive damages for each violation of

its Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process in an amount to be proved at trial;
7.5

A trial by jury on damages;

27
COMPLAINT - 12

9870.14 hd106701

MACDONALD HOAGUE & BAYLESS
705 Second Avenue, Suite 1500
Seattle, Washington 98104
Tel 206.622.1604 Fax 206.343.3961

Case 3:14-cv-05304-JRC Document 1 Filed 04/11/14 Page 13 of 13

7.6

1
2

Costs, including reasonable attorney’s fees, under 42 U.S.C. § 1988, and under

other applicable law;

3

7.7

Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest;

4

7.8

The right to conform the pleadings to the proof and evidence presented at trial;

7.9

Such other relief as the Court deems just and equitable.

5
6

and

DATED this 11th day of April, 2014.

7

MacDONALD HOAGUE & BAYLESS

8
9

By: s/ Jesse Wing
Jesse Wing, WSBA # 27751
Katherine C. Chamberlain, WSBA # 40014
MACDONALD HOAGUE & BAYLESS
705 Second Avenue, Suite 1500
Seattle, Washington 98104
E-Mails: JesseW@mhb.com
KatherineC@mhb.com
Telephone: (206) 622-1604
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PRISON LEGAL NEWS, a project of the
HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
COMPLAINT - 13

9870.14 hd106701

MACDONALD HOAGUE & BAYLESS
705 Second Avenue, Suite 1500
Seattle, Washington 98104
Tel 206.622.1604 Fax 206.343.3961



 

Prisoner Education Guide side

 

Advertise here

 

The Habeas Citebook Ineffective Counsel Side

 

PLN Subscribe Now Ad 450x450
The Habeas Citebook: Prosecutorial Misconduct Footer