HRDC v. DHS, WA, Complaint, Public Records, 2018
Download original document:
Document text
Document text
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
Case 2:18-cv-01141-TSZ Document 1 Filed 08/03/18 Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 The Human Rights Defense Center and Michelle Dillon, 10 No. Plaintiffs, 11 COMPLAINT v. 12 13 U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 14 Defendants. 15 16 1. This lawsuit is an action under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, 17 et seq., seeking production of records responsive to a request submitted by Ms. Michelle 18 Dillon, an employee of the Human Rights Defense Center, to Immigration and Customs 19 Enforcement. 20 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 21 2. This Court has both subject matter jurisdiction over this action and personal 22 jurisdiction over the defendant under 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B) and 2201(a). 23 3. Venue is appropriate in this Court under 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B). 24 PARTIES 25 4. Plaintiff Human Rights Defense Center is a non-profit organization that 26 advocates on behalf of the human rights of people held in U.S. detention facilities. Its advocacy 27 FOIA COMPLAINT - 1 4819-8010-3022v.1 0050033-000558 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O FFICE S 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax Case 2:18-cv-01141-TSZ Document 1 Filed 08/03/18 Page 2 of 6 1 efforts include publishing Prison Legal News, a 72-page monthly publication that covers 2 prison-related news and litigation nationwide, and Criminal Legal News, a monthly publication 3 that covers the criminal justice system beyond incarceration. The Human Rights Defense 4 Center also publishes and distributes self-help reference books for prisoners, and engages in 5 litigation, media campaigns and outreach, public speaking and education, and testimony before 6 legislative and regulatory bodies. 7 8 9 10 11 5. Plaintiff Michelle Dillon resides in the Western District of Washington. She is an employee of the Human Rights Defense Center in its Seattle office. 6. Defendant Department of Homeland Security is a department of the executive branch of the U.S. government and is an agency within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. § 552(f)(1). 7. Defendant Immigration and Customs Enforcement is a component of the United 12 States Department of Homeland Security and an agency under 5 U.S.C. §552(f)(1) and 5 13 U.S.C. § 701. 14 FACTS Human Rights Defense Center’s Background and Mission 15 16 8. The Human Rights Defense Center was founded in 1990. It is dedicated to 17 public education, prisoner education, advocacy, and outreach to support the rights of prisoners 18 and to further basic human rights. 19 9. The Human Rights Defense Center’s publishing project distributes books to 20 prisoners and other customers. It also publishes two monthly magazines, Criminal Legal News 21 and Prison Legal News. 22 23 24 25 10. In addition to publishing, the Human Rights Defense Center engages is advocacy and education. 11. Prior to a 2009 name change, the entire organization was known as Prisoners’ Legal News. 26 27 FOIA COMPLAINT - 2 4819-8010-3022v.1 0050033-000558 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O FFICE S 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax Case 2:18-cv-01141-TSZ Document 1 Filed 08/03/18 Page 3 of 6 Immigration and Customs Enforcement 1 2 12. The United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement enforces federal laws 3 governing border control, customs, trade and immigration. It is a component of the United 4 States Department of Homeland Security. The Request for Information at Issue 5 6 7 8 9 13. On March 20, 2018, Ms. Dillon sent a request via email to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement for certain records related to litigation that the agency has resolved. 14. On behalf of the Human Rights Defense Center, Ms. Dillon requested records regarding litigation against ICE and its employees or agents created since January 1, 2010. She 10 limited her request to claims and cases in which the government paid $1,000 or more. For 11 traffic-related claims and cases, she limited her request to those in which the payout was more 12 than $50,000. 13 15. In each case or claim described above, she asked to be provided: 14 • The Complaint or Claim Form and any amended versions; 15 • The Verdict Form, Final Judgment, Settlement Agreement, Consent Decree, or other paper that resolved the case. 16 • 17 A record that shows the amount of money involved in the resolution and to whom it was paid. 18 19 16. The email requested a fee waiver. 20 17. Ms. Dillon’s request also included a spreadsheet of potential cases and claims, 21 based on the information provided on the United States Treasury Judgment Fund website. She 22 noted that the spreadsheet might not include reference to all responsive records, as some may 23 not have been included in the public database. 24 18. The Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s via email on April 2, 2018, 25 informing Ms. Dillon that the fee waiver request had been granted and that the request had been 26 assigned internal tracking number 2018-ICFO-26920. 27 FOIA COMPLAINT - 3 4819-8010-3022v.1 0050033-000558 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O FFICE S 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax Case 2:18-cv-01141-TSZ Document 1 Filed 08/03/18 Page 4 of 6 1 2 3 19. The email also invoked the agency’s right to ten-day extension under 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(B). 20. The Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Office of Information Governance 4 and Privacy further responded by letter dated April 18, 2018, informing Ms. Dillon that some 5 of the requested information may be duplicated on Public Access to Court Electronic Records, 6 www.PACER.gov. 7 21. On April 25, 2018, the ICE FOIA office asked Ms. Dillon via email for 8 clarification of the request. By further email correspondence, ICE FOIA clarified that the 9 request for clarification was a request to limit the time frame or scope of the document. 10 11 12 22. On April 26, 2018, Ms. Dillon notified ICE FOIA that the Human Rights Defense Center declined to narrow the request. 23. On June 20, Ms. Dillon received a letter via email from the ICE Office of 13 Information Governance and Privacy. That letter denied FOIA request, stating “After careful 14 review of your FOIA request, we determined that your request is too broad in scope, did not 15 specifically identify the records which you are seeking, or only posed questions to the agency.” 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 24. On June 26, 2018, Ms. Dillon filed an appeal of this denial to the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor for the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. 25. On July 6, 2018 that office sent an acknowledgment that the appeal was received on July 5, 2018 and assigned the number 2018-ICAP-00366 for tracking purposes. 26. Per 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(A)(ii), the Agency has twenty working days to respond, which expires on August 2, 2018. 27. As of the date of filing, Ms. Dillon and the Human Rights Defense Center have received no response to the appeal. THE HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER AND MS. DILLON’S CLAIM FOR RELIEF 25 26 Violation of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. §552 28. This claim incorporates paragraphs 1 – 26 by reference. 27 FOIA COMPLAINT - 4 4819-8010-3022v.1 0050033-000558 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O FFICE S 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax Case 2:18-cv-01141-TSZ Document 1 Filed 08/03/18 Page 5 of 6 29. 1 2 Immigration and Customs Enforcement wrongly withheld documents responsive to the properly submitted request. 30. 3 The Human Rights Defense Center and Ms. Dillon have a statutory right to all 4 the records sought, and there is no basis for the Immigration and Customs Enforcement to 5 withhold them. 31. 6 7 By failing to release all the records specifically requested, Immigration and Customs Enforcement has violated the Freedom of Information Act. 8 REQUESTED RELIEF The Human Rights Defense Center and Ms. Dillon therefore respectfully request that 9 10 this Court: 1. Declare that the records they seek are subject to the Freedom of Information 13 2. Order Immigration and Customs Enforcement to disclose the requested records; 14 3. Award costs and attorneys’ fees under 5 U.S.C. § (a)(4)(E); and 15 4. Grant such other relief as the Court may consider just and proper. 16 // 17 // 18 // 19 // 20 // 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 11 12 Act; FOIA COMPLAINT - 5 4819-8010-3022v.1 0050033-000558 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O FFICE S 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax Case 2:18-cv-01141-TSZ Document 1 Filed 08/03/18 Page 6 of 6 1 Date: August 3, 2018 Respectfully submitted, 2 /s/ Eric M. Stahl Eric M. Stahl, WSBA #27619 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone (206) 757-8148 Fax (206) 757-7148 Email: ericstahl@dwt.com 3 4 5 6 7 Deborah M. Golden Sabarish Neelakanta Human Rights Defense Center 316 F Street, NE #107 Washington, DC 20002 Telephone (202) 543-8100 Email: dgolden@humanrightsdefensecenter.org 8 9 10 11 12 Pro Hac Vice applications pending ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS THE HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER AND MICHELE DILLON 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 FOIA COMPLAINT - 6 4819-8010-3022v.1 0050033-000558 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP L AW O FFICE S 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200 Seattle, WA 98101-3045 206.622.3150 main · 206.757.7700 fax