HRDC v. Sherburne County, Minnesota; et al., MN, Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial, Censorship, 2020
Download original document:
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
CASE 0:20-cv-01817 Document 1 Filed 08/20/20 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Human Rights Defense Center, Civil File No.______________ Plaintiff, COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL vs. Sherburne County, Minnesota; Joel Brott, Sheriff, in his official and individual capacities; and Does 1–10, in their individual capacities, Defendant. Plaintiff Human Rights Defense Center (“HRDC”), by its undersigned counsel, for its Complaint against Defendants Sherburne County, Minnesota; Joel Brott, Sherriff, in his official and individual capacities; and Does 1–10, in their individual capacities (collectively “Defendants”), state and alleges as follows: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. HRDC brings this action to enjoin the Sherburne County Jail (the “Jail”) and its employees from unconstitutionally censoring HRDC’s magazines sent to incarcerated persons, and for damages arising from such censorship. 2. HRDC, a not-for-profit charitable organization, sends books, magazines, and other correspondence to persons incarcerated in the Jail. These materials educate incarcerated persons about their legal and civil rights and their options for accessing education while incarcerated. In communicating with such persons, HRDC engages in CASE 0:20-cv-01817 Document 1 Filed 08/20/20 Page 2 of 14 core protected speech and expressive conduct on matters of public concern, which are entitled to the highest protection afforded by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 3. Yet since June 2019, and on an ongoing basis, the Jail and its employees refuse to deliver HRDC’s magazines to incarcerated persons in violation of HRDC’s First Amendment right to free speech and communication. Further, Jail staff fail to notify HRDC when the Jail censored these mailings, violating HRDC’s Fourteenth Amendment rights to notice and an opportunity to challenge censorship. 4. Incarcerated persons may spend years in the Jail’s facilities. And yet they have extremely limited access to information from the outside world to make productive use of their period of incarceration and successfully prepare for re-entry to the public. In addition, incarcerated persons at the Jail have even less access to legal materials to inform them of their rights and assist them in their defense. 5. Because of their highly limited access to information inside the Jail, incarcerated persons rely on receiving mailings and books from organizations like HRDC. When the Jail prohibits incarcerated persons from receiving newspapers and magazines, these persons are left in the dark—deprived of the ability to defend themselves in the criminal cases against them or expand their minds through knowledge and education. Curtailing these basic legal and educational rights serves no legitimate penological interest; it only exacerbates the public safety problems associated with the criminal justice system and inadequately preparing persons for re-entry into society. 6. Accordingly, to ameliorate the injuries that the Defendants have inflicted on HRDC and its advocacy efforts, HRDC seeks damages for Defendants’ illegal actions and 2 CASE 0:20-cv-01817 Document 1 Filed 08/20/20 Page 3 of 14 injunctive relief to ensure that Defendants cease their ongoing violations of HRDC’s constitutional rights. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 7. This action is brought under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, as it arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States, and under 28 U.S.C. § 1343, as it seeks redress for civil-rights violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 8. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). On information and belief, at least one Defendant resides within this judicial district, and the events giving rise to the claims asserted herein occurred within this judicial district. 9. HRDC’s claims for relief are predicated upon 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which authorizes actions to redress the deprivation, under color of state law, of rights, privileges, and immunities secured to Plaintiff by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution and the laws of the United States. 10. This Court has jurisdiction over claims seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202, as well as claims seeking nominal and compensatory damages against all Defendants. 11. HRDC’s request for attorneys’ fees and costs is predicated upon 42 U.S.C. § 1988, which authorizes the award of attorneys’ fees and costs to prevailing plaintiffs in actions brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. PARTIES 12. HRDC is a not-for-profit charitable organization recognized under § 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, incorporated in the state of Washington and with 3 CASE 0:20-cv-01817 Document 1 Filed 08/20/20 Page 4 of 14 principal offices in Lake Worth, Florida. For more than 30 years, HRDC has focused on public education, advocacy, and outreach on behalf of, and for the purpose of assisting, incarcerated persons who seek legal redress for infringements of their constitutionally guaranteed and other basic human rights. HRDC’s mission, if realized, has a salutary effect on public safety. 13. Defendant Sherburne County, Minnesota is a unit of government organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Through its Board of Commissioners, Sherburne County delegates its authority for the operation of the Jail to Sheriff Brott. 14. Defendant Joel Brott (“Brott”) is the elected Sheriff of Sherburne County, Minnesota. Brott is responsible for overseeing the management and operations of the Jail, and for the hiring, screening, training, retention, supervision, discipline, counseling, and control of the personnel of the Jail who interpret and apply the mail policy to incarcerated persons. As Sheriff, Brott is a final policymaker for the Jail with respect its operations, including for policies governing incoming mail for incarcerated persons. He is sued in his official and individual capacities. 15. The true names and identities of Defendants DOES 1 through 10 are presently unknown to HRDC. Each of DOES 1 through 10 are or were employed by and are or were agents of the Jail when some or all of the challenged mail policies and practices at the Jail were adopted and/or implemented. Each of DOES 1 through 10 are or were personally involved in the adoption and/or implementation of the Jail’s mail policies for incarcerated persons, and/or are or were responsible for the hiring, screening, training, 4 CASE 0:20-cv-01817 Document 1 Filed 08/20/20 Page 5 of 14 retention, supervision, discipline, counseling, and/or control of the Jail staff who interpret and implement these mail policies. DOES 1 through 10 are sued in their individual capacities. HRDC will seek to amend this Complaint when the true names and identities of DOES 1 through 10 have been ascertained. 16. At all times material to this Complaint, the actions of all Defendants as alleged herein were taken under the authority and color of state law. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS I. HRDC’s Publications 17. For more than 30 years, HRDC’s mission has been public education, advocacy and outreach on behalf of, and for the purpose of assisting, prisoners who seek legal redress for infringements of their constitutionally guaranteed and other basic human rights. HRDC’s mission, if realized, has a salutary effect on public safety. 18. To accomplish its mission, HRDC publishes and distributes books, magazines, and other information containing news and analysis about prisons, jails and other detention facilities, prisoners’ rights, court rulings, management of prison facilities, prison conditions and other matters pertaining to the rights and/or interests of incarcerated individuals. 19. HRDC publishes and distributes an award-winning, 72-page monthly magazine titled Prison Legal News: Dedicated to Protecting Human Rights, which contains news and analysis about prisons, jails, and other detention facilities, prisoners’ rights, court opinions, management of prison facilities, prison conditions, and other matters pertaining to the rights and/or interests of incarcerated individuals. 5 CASE 0:20-cv-01817 Document 1 Filed 08/20/20 Page 6 of 14 20. More recently, HRDC also began publishing a second monthly magazine, Criminal Legal News. This magazine is 56 pages, and focuses on review and analysis of individual rights, court rulings, and news concerning criminal justice-related issues. 21. HRDC has thousands of subscribers to its monthly magazines in the United States and abroad, including incarcerated persons, attorneys, judges, journalists, libraries, and members of the public. Since its creation in 1990, HRDC has sent its publications to prisoners and law librarians in more than 3,000 correctional facilities across the United States, including death row units and institutions within the Federal Bureau of Prisons, such as the federal Administrative Maximum Facility (“ADX” or “Supermax”) in Florence, Colorado—the most secure prison in the United States. Prison Legal News is distributed to prisons and jails within the correctional systems of all 50 states, including to dozens of incarcerated persons housed in facilities in Minnesota. 22. HRDC has attempted to send these important publications to persons incarcerated at the Jail. Yet Defendants maintain mail policies or practices that unconstitutionally prevent individuals incarcerated at the Jail from receiving HRDC’s materials. II. Defendants’ Mail Policies and Practices 23. According to the Sherburne County Jail mail policy: “Inmate mail will be checked for contraband prior to distribution. Examples of items considered to be contraband are: …. 6 CASE 0:20-cv-01817 Document 1 Filed 08/20/20 Page 7 of 14 • Newspapers/Magazines: articles” Sherburne County Jail mail including small clippings or policy, available https://www.co.sherburne.mn.us/314/Inmate-Phone-Email-Provider-Mail at (last visited Aug. 19, 2020). 24. The Jail’s mail policy has no provision for giving notice to the sender when mail is rejected. 25. According to the Sherburne County Jail Policy and Procedure Manual, magazines are considered contraband and are not allowed in the facility. 26. According to the Sherburne County Jail Policy and Procedures Manual, inmates in general population have access to a daily newspaper. That newspaper, one copy of the Minneapolis Star Tribune, is shared amongst all inmates. Inmates in segregation do not have access to the daily newspaper. 27. Inmates do not have access to electronic reading materials. 28. Email access is limited and the jail censors incoming email, removing any articles and prohibiting electronic reading materials. III. 29. Defendants’ Censorship of HRDC’s Mail Beginning in June 2019, Defendants censored monthly issues of Prison Legal News and Criminal Legal News sent by HRDC to incarcerated persons in the Jail. Defendants refused, and continue to refuse, to deliver these publications to the incarcerated persons. 7 CASE 0:20-cv-01817 Document 1 Filed 08/20/20 Page 8 of 14 30. In January 2020 an inmate suspended his subscription to Prison Legal News after the jail refused to deliver it based on the prohibition against magazines. That inmate expressed his continued interest in receiving the publication. 31. In July 2020, HRDC attempted to mail six different types of mail to inmates at the Jail including the following: a copy of Prison Legal News; a copy of Criminal Legal News; a book titled Protecting Your Health and Safety; a book titled Prisoners Guerrilla Handbook; an envelope containing HRDC publications; and an envelope with the court ruling Clement v. California Dept. of Corrections. Three inmates informed HRDC that a majority of the materials were confiscated and undelivered. One inmate received both copies of the magazines, but nothing else was delivered. 32. Such restrictions on written speech sent to persons incarcerated at the Jail are not rationally related to any legitimate penological interest and violate HRDC’s First Amendment right to communicate speech to incarcerated persons. 33. Defendants’ policies, practices, and customs are unconstitutional, both facially and as applied to HRDC. 34. Further, Defendants’ censorship policies, practices, and customs have a chilling effect on HRDC’s future speech and expression directed toward persons incarcerated at the Jail. 35. HRDC will continue to mail copies of its magazines to subscribers, customers, and other individuals imprisoned in the Jail, despite Defendants’ unconstitutional censorship. Plaintiff seeks the protection of this Court to ensure that Defendants cease their unlawful misconduct, and either deliver HRDC’s written speech or 8 CASE 0:20-cv-01817 Document 1 Filed 08/20/20 Page 9 of 14 satisfy due process by providing HRDC with the basis for any censorship so that HRDC may challenge the censorship. IV. Defendants’ Failure to Provide Due Process Notice and an Opportunity to Appeal 36. Defendants failed to provide HRDC with any notice of the rejection of Prison Legal News, Criminal Legal News, or any other mailings. 37. Further, Defendants failed to provide HRDC with an opportunity to appeal the censorship of its mail. V. Defendants’ Unconstitutional Mail Policies and Practices Are Causing HRDC Ongoing and Irreparable Harm and Damages. 38. Defendants’ deprivation of HRDC’s constitutional rights, both past and continuing, constitutes irreparable harm. 39. Due to Defendants’ actions described above, HRDC has suffered damages, and will continue to suffer damages, including but not limited to: frustration of its ability to disseminate its political message, to recruit new subscribers and supporters, and to advance its mission as a not-for-profit organization; significant diversion and waste of HRDC resources, including staff time; loss of potential subscribers and customers; and damage to its reputation. 40. Defendants’ actions and omissions were and are all committed under color of law and with reckless indifference to HRDC’s rights. 41. Defendants and their agents are responsible for—or personally participated in—creating and implementing these unconstitutional policies, practices, and customs, 9 CASE 0:20-cv-01817 Document 1 Filed 08/20/20 Page 10 of 14 and/or ratifying or adopting them. Further, Defendant Brott is responsible for training and supervising employees whose conduct has injured and continues to injure HRDC. 42. Defendants’ unconstitutional policies, practices, and customs are ongoing, and continue to violate HRDC’s constitutional rights—causing irreparable harm. Defendants’ unconstitutional policies, practices, and customs will continue unless enjoined. As such, HRDC has no adequate remedy at law. 43. In addition to damages, HRDC is entitled to injunctive relief prohibiting Defendants from unconstitutionally censoring and refusing to deliver HRDC’s magazines and depriving HRDC of due process of law. CAUSES OF ACTION FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF Violation of the First Amendment Right to Free Speech Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Brought Against All Defendants) 44. HRDC repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation set forth above, and incorporates them herein by reference. 45. The acts described above constitute violations of HRDC’s rights under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 46. HRDC has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in communicating with incarcerated individuals by sending its materials, including the magazines Prison Legal News and Criminal Legal News, to them via U.S. Mail. Defendants’ unconstitutional censorship violates HRDC’s clearly established right to communicate with these individuals. 10 CASE 0:20-cv-01817 Document 1 Filed 08/20/20 Page 11 of 14 47. There is no legitimate penological interest justifying Defendants’ unconstitutional censorship of HRDC’s magazines. 48. Defendants’ conduct is objectively unreasonable and was undertaken recklessly, intentionally, willfully, with malice, and with deliberate indifference to the rights of others. 49. HRDC’s injuries and the violations of its constitutional rights were directly and proximately caused by Defendants’ policies and practices; and those policies and practices were the moving force behind the violations. 50. The acts described above have caused HRDC to suffer damages, and if not enjoined, will continue to cause HRDC to suffer irreparable harm and damages. 51. HRDC seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, and nominal and compensatory damages against all Defendants. HRDC seeks punitive damages against the individual Defendants in their individual capacities. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF Violation of the Fourteenth Amendment Right to Due Process Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Brought Against All Defendants) 52. HRDC repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation set forth above, and incorporates them herein by reference. 53. The acts described above violate HRDC’s rights and the rights of other correspondents who have attempted to or intend to correspond with persons incarcerated in the Jail, under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. 11 CASE 0:20-cv-01817 Document 1 Filed 08/20/20 Page 12 of 14 54. HRDC has a clearly established right under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to receive notice of and an opportunity to object and/or appeal Defendants’ decisions to prevent Plaintiff’s mail from reaching incarcerated persons held in the Jail. 55. Defendants’ policy and practice of censoring HRDC’s magazines fails to provide Plaintiff with notice of the censorship or an opportunity to be heard. Defendants did not provide constitutionally adequate notice of the censorship of HRDC’s magazines, nor did Defendants provide HRDC an opportunity to appeal the censorship decision with a party not involved in that original decision. Thus, Defendants are violating HRDC’s clearly established right to due process. 56. Defendants’ conduct is objectively unreasonable and was undertaken recklessly, intentionally, willfully, with malice, and with deliberate indifference to the rights of others. 57. HRDC’s injuries and the violations of its constitutional rights were directly and proximately caused by Defendants’ policies and practices; and those policies and practices were the moving force behind the violations. 58. The acts described above have caused HRDC to suffer irreparable harm and damages, and if not enjoined, will continue to cause HRDC to suffer irreparable harm and damages 59. HRDC seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, and nominal and compensatory damages against all Defendants. HRDC seeks punitive damages against the individual Defendants in their individual capacities. 12 CASE 0:20-cv-01817 Document 1 Filed 08/20/20 Page 13 of 14 REQUEST FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests relief as follows: 1. A declaration that Defendants’ policies and practices violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution; 2. Preliminary and permanent injunctions preventing Defendants from continuing to violate the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, and providing other equitable relief; 3. Nominal damages for each violation of HRDC’s rights by Defendants; 4. Compensatory damages against Defendants in an amount to be proved at trial; 5. Punitive damages against the individual Defendants in their individual capacities, in an amount to be proved at trial; 6. An award of costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and other applicable law; and 7. Such further and additional relief as this Court may deem just and equitable. JURY DEMAND Plaintiff Human Rights Defense Center hereby demands a trial by jury pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38(b) on all issues so triable. 13 CASE 0:20-cv-01817 Document 1 Filed 08/20/20 Page 14 of 14 Dated: August 20, 2020 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP By s/ RJ Zayed RJ Zayed (#0309849) firstname.lastname@example.org Alex P. Hontos (#0388355) email@example.com Donna Reuter (#0400572) firstname.lastname@example.org 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (612) 340-2600 Facsimile: (612) 340-2868 HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER Daniel Marshall* email@example.com Eric Taylor* firstname.lastname@example.org P.O. Box 1151 Lake Worth, FL 33460 Telephone: (561) 360-2523 Facsimile: (561) 828-8166 Attorneys for Plaintiff Human Rights Defense Center *Pro hac vice applications to be filed 14 CASE 0:20-cv-01817 Document 1-1 Filed 08/20/20 Page 1 of 2 &,9,/&29(56+((7 -6 5HY 7KH-6FLYLOFRYHUVKHHWDQGWKHLQIRUPDWLRQFRQWDLQHGKHUHLQQHLWKHUUHSODFHQRUVXSSOHPHQWWKHILOLQJDQGVHUYLFHRISOHDGLQJVRURWKHUSDSHUVDVUHTXLUHGE\ODZH[FHSWDV SURYLGHGE\ORFDOUXOHVRIFRXUW7KLVIRUPDSSURYHGE\WKH-XGLFLDO&RQIHUHQFHRIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHVLQ6HSWHPEHULVUHTXLUHGIRUWKHXVHRIWKH&OHUNRI&RXUWIRUWKH SXUSRVHRILQLWLDWLQJWKHFLYLOGRFNHWVKHHW(SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.) , D 3/$,17,))6 '()(1'$176 Human Rights Defense Center E &RXQW\RI5HVLGHQFHRI)LUVW/LVWHG3ODLQWLII Sherburne County, Minnesota; Joel Brott, Sheriff, in his official and individual capacities; and Does 1–10, in their individual capacities &RXQW\RI5HVLGHQFHRI)LUVW/LVWHG'HIHQGDQW Sherburne Palm Beach County (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY) ,1/$1'&21'(01$7,21&$6(686(7+(/2&$7,212) 7+(75$&72)/$1',192/9(' $WWRUQH\V(If Known) 127( F $WWRUQH\V(Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) R.J. Zayed, Alex Hontos, and Donna Reuter, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500, Minneapolis, MN 55402 ,,%$6,62)-85,6',&7,21(Place an “X” in One Box Only) u 86*RYHUQPHQW 3ODLQWLII u )HGHUDO4XHVWLRQ (U.S. Government Not a Party) u 86*RYHUQPHQW 'HIHQGDQW u 'LYHUVLW\ (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) ,,,&,7,=(16+,32)35,1&,3$/3$57,(6 (Place an “X” in One Box for Plaintiff (For Diversity Cases Only) 37) '() &LWL]HQRI7KLV6WDWH u u and One Box for Defendant) 37) '() ,QFRUSRUDWHGor3ULQFLSDO3ODFH u u RI%XVLQHVV,Q7KLV6WDWH &LWL]HQRI$QRWKHU6WDWH u u ,QFRUSRUDWHGand3ULQFLSDO3ODFH RI%XVLQHVV,Q$QRWKHU6WDWH u u &LWL]HQRU6XEMHFWRID )RUHLJQ&RXQWU\ u u )RUHLJQ1DWLRQ u u ,91$785(2)68,7(Place an “X” in One Box Only) &2175$&7 u u u u ,QVXUDQFH 0DULQH 0LOOHU$FW 1HJRWLDEOH,QVWUXPHQW 5HFRYHU\RI2YHUSD\PHQW (QIRUFHPHQWRI-XGJPHQW 0HGLFDUH$FW 5HFRYHU\RI'HIDXOWHG 6WXGHQW/RDQV ([FOXGHV9HWHUDQV 5HFRYHU\RI2YHUSD\PHQW RI9HWHUDQ¶V%HQHILWV 6WRFNKROGHUV¶6XLWV 2WKHU&RQWUDFW &RQWUDFW3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ )UDQFKLVH u u u u u u 5($/3523(57< /DQG&RQGHPQDWLRQ )RUHFORVXUH 5HQW/HDVH (MHFWPHQW 7RUWVWR/DQG 7RUW3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ $OO2WKHU5HDO3URSHUW\ u u u u u u u u &OLFNKHUHIRU1DWXUHRI6XLW&RGH'HVFULSWLRQV 72576 3(5621$/,1-85< u $LUSODQH u $LUSODQH3URGXFW /LDELOLW\ u $VVDXOW/LEHO 6ODQGHU u )HGHUDO(PSOR\HUV¶ /LDELOLW\ u 0DULQH u 0DULQH3URGXFW /LDELOLW\ u 0RWRU9HKLFOH u 0RWRU9HKLFOH 3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ u 2WKHU3HUVRQDO ,QMXU\ u 3HUVRQDO,QMXU\ 0HGLFDO0DOSUDFWLFH &,9,/5,*+76 u 2WKHU&LYLO5LJKWV u 9RWLQJ u (PSOR\PHQW u +RXVLQJ $FFRPPRGDWLRQV u $PHUZ'LVDELOLWLHV (PSOR\PHQW u $PHUZ'LVDELOLWLHV 2WKHU u (GXFDWLRQ )25)(,785(3(1$/7< 3(5621$/,1-85< u 3HUVRQDO,QMXU\ 3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ u +HDOWK&DUH 3KDUPDFHXWLFDO 3HUVRQDO,QMXU\ 3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ u $VEHVWRV3HUVRQDO ,QMXU\3URGXFW /LDELOLW\ 3(5621$/3523(57< u 2WKHU)UDXG u 7UXWKLQ/HQGLQJ u 2WKHU3HUVRQDO 3URSHUW\'DPDJH u 3URSHUW\'DPDJH 3URGXFW/LDELOLW\ 35,621(53(7,7,216 +DEHDV&RUSXV u $OLHQ'HWDLQHH u 0RWLRQVWR9DFDWH 6HQWHQFH u *HQHUDO u 'HDWK3HQDOW\ 2WKHU u 0DQGDPXV 2WKHU u &LYLO5LJKWV u 3ULVRQ&RQGLWLRQ u &LYLO'HWDLQHH &RQGLWLRQVRI &RQILQHPHQW u 'UXJ5HODWHG6HL]XUH RI3URSHUW\86& u 2WKHU /$%25 u )DLU/DERU6WDQGDUGV $FW u /DERU0DQDJHPHQW 5HODWLRQV u 5DLOZD\/DERU$FW u )DPLO\DQG0HGLFDO /HDYH$FW u 2WKHU/DERU/LWLJDWLRQ u (PSOR\HH5HWLUHPHQW ,QFRPH6HFXULW\$FW %$1.5837&< u $SSHDO86& u :LWKGUDZDO 86& 3523(57<5,*+76 u &RS\ULJKWV u 3DWHQW u 3DWHQW$EEUHYLDWHG 1HZ'UXJ$SSOLFDWLRQ u 7UDGHPDUN 62&,$/6(&85,7< u +,$ II u %ODFN/XQJ u ',:&',:: J u 66,'7LWOH;9, u 56, J )('(5$/7$;68,76 u 7D[HV 863ODLQWLII RU'HIHQGDQW u ,56²7KLUG3DUW\ 86& ,00,*5$7,21 u 1DWXUDOL]DWLRQ$SSOLFDWLRQ u 2WKHU,PPLJUDWLRQ $FWLRQV 27+(567$787(6 u )DOVH&ODLPV$FW u 4XL7DP 86& D u 6WDWH5HDSSRUWLRQPHQW u $QWLWUXVW u %DQNVDQG%DQNLQJ u &RPPHUFH u 'HSRUWDWLRQ u 5DFNHWHHU,QIOXHQFHGDQG &RUUXSW2UJDQL]DWLRQV u &RQVXPHU&UHGLW 86&RU u 7HOHSKRQH&RQVXPHU 3URWHFWLRQ$FW u &DEOH6DW79 u 6HFXULWLHV&RPPRGLWLHV ([FKDQJH u 2WKHU6WDWXWRU\$FWLRQV u $JULFXOWXUDO$FWV u (QYLURQPHQWDO0DWWHUV u )UHHGRPRI,QIRUPDWLRQ $FW u $UELWUDWLRQ u $GPLQLVWUDWLYH3URFHGXUH $FW5HYLHZRU$SSHDORI $JHQF\'HFLVLRQ u &RQVWLWXWLRQDOLW\RI 6WDWH6WDWXWHV 925,*,1(Place an “X” in One Box Only) u 2ULJLQDO 3URFHHGLQJ u 5HPRYHGIURP 6WDWH&RXUW 9,&$86(2)$&7,21 u 5HPDQGHGIURP $SSHOODWH&RXUW u 5HLQVWDWHGRU 5HRSHQHG u 7UDQVIHUUHGIURP $QRWKHU'LVWULFW u 0XOWLGLVWULFW /LWLJDWLRQ 7UDQVIHU (specify) &LWHWKH86&LYLO6WDWXWHXQGHUZKLFK\RXDUHILOLQJ(Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity) 28 U.S.C. § 1343; 42 U.S.C. § 1983; 28 U.S.C. § 2201; 28 U.S.C. § 2202 %ULHIGHVFULSWLRQRIFDXVH u 0XOWLGLVWULFW /LWLJDWLRQ 'LUHFW)LOH Declaratory judgment regarding violation of First and Fourteenth Amendments u &+(&.,)7+,6,6$&/$66$&7,21 9,,5(48(67(',1 81'(558/()5&Y3 &203/$,17 9,,,5(/$7('&$6( 6 (See instructions): ,)$1< -8'*( '$7( &+(&.<(6RQO\LIGHPDQGHGLQFRPSODLQW u <HV u 1R -85<'(0$1' '(0$1' '2&.(7180%(5 6,*1$785(2)$77251(<2)5(&25' s/ Donna Reuter 08/20/2020 )252)),&(86(21/< 5(&(,37 $02817 $33/<,1*,)3 -8'*( 0$*-8'*( -65HYHUVH 5HY CASE 0:20-cv-01817 Document 1-1 Filed 08/20/20 Page 2 of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±7UDQVIHU &KHFNWKLVER[ZKHQDPXOWLGLVWULFWFDVHLVWUDQVIHUUHGLQWRWKHGLVWULFWXQGHUDXWKRULW\RI7LWOH86& 6HFWLRQ 0XOWLGLVWULFW/LWLJDWLRQ±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