Humanists of Washington v. Lehman, Washington DOC censorship Settlement. 1999.
Download original document:

Document text

Document text
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
FAX NO.
roT-Ol-59 FRI 04: 45 p
U~
•
1
2
3
4
o
5
ORABI.£ FRAN
IN D. B
GESS
6
7
UNITED ST TES DISTRICT COURT
I -Tm~- DI Tluer 0
Hll 'GTO
T
CO I
\:
8
9
HUMANI"fS OF WASHfNGTO ,et ai"
NO.
v.
U
12
C9'1~5499FDB
Plaintiffs,
10
REI.E.<\SE AND
SEI rLE ENT AOREEME
JOSEPH LEJl1'fA , el al,
DefenOants.
Flaintiffs. Humanis.[s 0 Washington fim NationAl PriS'on Projecc Of thE; Am~r:ican
Liberties
nion FoWlda ion, Ie.
<I-
pp-
LUF~),
ivil
Rollin Wright, Billy Blankenship, Keith
16
Closson. Mark Cook, William Robert Harris, Jerry Hawlcins, lich..'leI Potersan, Randy Tone sen.
17
and Paut W 'ghE, by and through their attorneys we
1
BRI. 'G~ fA
19
Attomey GanerJl, KASEY C. KNEIP a.nd HEATHER Kl.ErN, Assistam Attorneys Geoeral, and
20
NlICHAEL T.
21
IDutual ,prom~ e he ein. arid jn mutua! decision to r~Qh/c lbe ~hll\le-C'apLioned maLLet"
22
further lidg tion., hereby agree as
W. GENDLER and JOSEPH E.
and Defel1dan.5. by and hrou~ their attorneys, C1:IRISTINE O. GREGOIRE
~ITfCHELL,
Senior .I\ssistl.m Artorney General- bas d pon considernlfon and
'oUt
rouows::
In cO'l1sideration of me foUowing provisions Of the release and settlement agreernen
1.
13
•
manis s of Wa.Jihillgton, the - at~ona1 Prison Project of the Ameritafl Civil Liberties
2
plainiffs
_5
r niOIl Poundation, Jnc, , Ronin
26
Robert
Harrl.~.
riglu.. Billy Bl
emhip Keith
Clos!ion~
M.1rk Coo,
minrn
Jerry Hawkins, Michael PClcrson, Randy ToUe fs,eo , and Paul Wrigh, !:heir heirs
Rf..r.E SF. A '[)I SETfLl!ME
j\:uREE, eN'f
•
ATrullJ trr(iDlCRALOE'Wh5IU 010
Crhni~lIl 11 t~
DIY! Ign
.!'o JllPl '4Q 116
0IlJ:flp· INA ?U04.oWI
(.l6D) 5S~144S
I
"I
1
assigns or orller 5ucces..o;.ors in intere.c:t do hereby release and forever discharge the State of
2
WaslulllgtOll. its officers, agents. employees 1 agencies, a.ru:I departments for any and all exist' g and
3
furul,e claims, damages and 3U:Se5 of acfon of any nature wh:atso er arising out of lh e ertain
4
UlC· denlS,
5
Sllppiemented Complaint for DeclamtoIY and Injunc ive Reli f o.nd are Lhe source of this
6
lawsuit c.1ptionad above, prav id ed, howe....er that this tel ens e does nOt . rend fo exisri n 0 fUture
7
laUns, damages andiar cau~es of action mat relate in any way to phunliffs' Fifth Claim for Rehef.
j
occurrences, casualties or events
Plaintiffs and dcicndants have agreed
2.
8
9
mt;h are de.scribed in the F ,t
ended and
claj~l1
w reso \Ie this !aWSll i witho u
and
rurthel"
lidgation in the following ma.DIlC!:
a.
10
Inmate plainlifis agree ta dismiss ,,,ith prejodice U1eir First Claim for Relief
bulk m H poHcy llS slated in
Pai[}t~.ffS.'
First Am~ndC!d and
11
I;haHcDglng the defend ls
12
Supplem n d Complai t for DccJarorQry
13
Policy 450.100 MaH for Ommders, effec.ti . . 'e January 10 1999. provides for 51atewidt: ~ffet:t of dle
1.
settletne.l1t reached in
15
Wash.)) en Oc~obrO. 1998.
b.
16
~d
lnjunc(lvC Relief on the basis that amndcd DO
Miniken v. Waller, EDe Cause No, C 96-407-JLQ (1997 WL 778753 (E.n.
Publisher Is.Lntiffs agree
dismiss Mlh prejudice th ir Seeo d Cla.imor Relier
17
challenging lhe ddendants' bulk ma!l policy as staled In Plainfffs' First Am n eel an
18
Sllpplemcnrcd Complaint fot Dcdar; tory and Injun ive Relief
19
Policy 4-0.100, Mail for Off ndcrs effective J3flWl1}' 10 1999t provides for stare",,;d elli
20
sc tIemenl reached in . . ·"e vo_ Waller on October 10, 1998.
23
2
25
the basis mat amended DOC
J
c.
21
22
011
I
or he
PIa..i.l1tiff:S ;lg1't,;~ to dismiss with prejudice ilieir Third Claim for Reiie as stated in
Fla.i riffs' First Amended and Suppl'emerued Complain for Declaratory and Injunctiv ReHer um1er
the folJ.aw ing p rovisjoos:
Defendants agI1
to amend DOC Policy 50.100,
lai for Offcnde:rs, consistent
ich Ute
dtecision in Crofton. v. Roe:, 110 F.3d 957 (9" Cir. 1999') tQub5tanllally provide:
26
ItELEA c:
0 SE""ITLEMI£
An REfM E:NT
'r
AUQiJI.l'(EY G-eNLW./ 1. OF w
CyjlJlilUl
Ju.~[=
1'O!lo;I>l
O·
~.
0,
~:Hmmo!'l
l4rII
~.oll~
WII. \;IH~J04-0ll
{31:tI, :i SQ. I ~~~
I
ccr-0I-B9 FR I
I~ eive
Inmates may
l}
1
P. 04
FAX NO.
04: 45 Pff
gift subscriptions and/or publica! ions from any party other
than from another inmaEl3: or [he mends or family of another unrelated lnmnte~
2
I
j.
2)
InIlmtes are responsible for notifYing fu~ pu lish
4
3)
WhUe an. inmatc may be !:he benflficiary ·of a gift subscription and/or publication.
of an.)' change of address;
5
thl; inmate may be temporarily deprived of actual receip or poession of the publica ion whtl ill
,6
the
7
specific tempornry property restrictions placed on the i.nrnate;
lM •
segregEl.~iQll. Of
~f
4)
S
$ubjctt to other ~ e:shicUons
[IlOpflrty
conlstent wilh the
,an inmate is subject to a property es.trictiD!'!. 2ny gift subse 'plion arniIor
publi adon win be held for at least ninEy (90) days b a e
9
egardlug
e inma e ·s.
uired to oEify Sla to
10 se d out, donat or destroy th subscriptron.
I
11
d.
12
Plaintiffs
t3
rela tes
1
I
TO
foUowing
Plilintiffs agree
dls:rnlss widl prejudice th ir FOllrth. Clai,n for R,e]ief 3S sw,(
[Q
in
irs! Amended and Supplemented Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Rdjef as it
the ['lubrication known as Maoisr Inlern.ationalist .Movement" MlMJ
ales under the
provL~' ons;
Defendants agree
ro review the M]].iI
publica ion
a is
:y-i~ ue b i:s
15
1)
16
and agre
17
organil.'ltiomJ purpose. as '" struggl ring lo]nd oppr .sian y build{wg] public opinion 0 sciz
S
not to rcj ec lbc pUbl ication
p,Qwer through tlnncd stNggI ..,
:sole~y
0 eti
0
on the bJl..S rs that each
fndants further agrea 'fa reviel,( each issue of MI
19
e aluari g the o tent of each i.!isuc in conjunction with !:he maslhead adocaung ..stnlggLe ro
20
oppress-ron hy b\1ild[ing] public opinion to. seize pCl"Vermmugh armed
21
22
23
2)
I
c.
n
otes is decmali to be a: thn:ac oeg'timate
If the content oE lin ISsue of MlM
penologica objectives defendants reserve he ri· h
~tl1lgg1e.
0
rejec ltIe is-sue.
Plaintiff Paul WrighL agrees [0 di:smiss without prejudice: the Fftb Claim fur Relief.
24
Sexually Explicit Materials, asstnt2d in Plaintry First Amended and Supplemented Cmnp]aml for
25
Decl amtory and Injunctive ReHer.
26
RELEASE A 0 SE1TlEMHNT
AGREBMENT
o
BY Ul!iNr!JVI1. 01' WA.SII
Crimillw JUU.illC Di~~i
1'(Il'l00l 11110
(1)1l\~j., W" ~8SC4-0 [ LiS
0,1,0) s8&-H-4~
010
I.
I
1
•
o
Dc rcDL1l1~ 'fuJ-rilic£
~
serio
infraction
in'
I n.
r in determining wh~thc:t
8
N
728 infraction n
11
U'eJLed as a gen
1infracdon may incIu
bem C1' 1h in
o
"128 i
.~
ctual pcuetnUioD ami
ua.!ly explicit ma~er' 1 w
ned and a.pproved by
l
ilie sexually c pli lE
II.
in
ill
RELEASE A
AGPJlt;ME
.Il:NI,V[[E-MJ-llA1...0r w..sJ1t
I J
e
Ii
POllOi
01 InrI.
116
~ 9U{).~.ij1 HI
(~~a) ~.lI(" L~~5
~.
FAX NO.
Defendants further agree that a Department of Corrections ...mployee who is directly
2)
1
0
2
supervised by the persou who made rhe initial rejection dec'sian shall not hear the appeal. 'Direc
3
supervision" is defined as the direct and immediate superv' or and shallot inc de tbose
4
cmp!oyecs who are in me same chain of comrna.nd Of line of superv1sion but are not
5
supervisor.
For mall iwns rejec.rcd
3)
6
.. Sl;':xua
y~.>;.plit,;tC·,
de fend.an ts agree to provide
7
descriptive language in "the mail rejection oorrce. Specifically, defe
8
DOC 05-525
9
plcture~
fO
ants .agree to arne d form
provide a listing of descrip ive categories, such as whether 0_ not the item is; a) a
b) cartoon; c) written depiction; d) advertisemenr~ or e) other. Plaintiffs agree to dis. niss
10
Wilh prejudice lhe remainder of the claim addressing mail appeal
11
natt.lre.
L2
e direct
4)
lat are non-sexually expl"cit in
Plaintifl:1; agree to dismiss with prejudice. their Seventh Claim for ReHef wimin their
13
Fies( Amended and Supplemented Complaint or Declaratory and Injunc lve Relief as it relates to
14
tho danlal of non-subscripdOll bulk mall ant! Ihe refusal of defeodant~
15
and publisher plaintiffs of ~nfisc.nted or discarded
16
h.
0
notify inmace plaintiffs
non-subscription bulk rnail items.
Plaimiffs' Eighth Claim for ReLief as staled in Plai -tiffs' Firsl }uncnded and
]7
Supplemented Complaint for Declaratory an Injunctive Relief challenging inrnale· o-jnm,He ma.il
18
restrictiol1s, indudi ng the resrrictions on th kd pa.rties from eod ing legal materials to inmates T lS
19
settled on rhe following: condiriofl.'l,:
20
21
22
23
24
1)
Pial tiffs agree to tlismi S willi prejudice all
laims caHenging the defendants'
restrictions on inrnate-to-innl'lre correspondence.
2)
Deferulant~
agree to deliver "legal materials" mai ed to 'Vashington State inmates
hy non-inmate, rhird-party senders under the following terms:
a)
"Legal material ., me defined as
1 dicial opinions (published and unpublished),
2S
reports and recommendations, orders. complaints. or answen>. settlement agrcementR, class action,
26
noticas t legal briefs and' memoranda, and roo ·ons.
R.!2LEASE AN]) SETTLEMEN'I'
AGRF.EME T
j
The legal materials wi
be screenoo by
....rrolt.N'F.:Y OI'NF.RAL OV W,\j."lNGTO~
CnmILU!
r~
ICe D'~I
t'"o tlnK ·0116
'tl~
OlympirJ, WA9UM-OI16
().fiiO~ s:86-144~
OCT~Oi-99
FRl 04:46
correctional staff upon receipt lnto the irmitudon wnich may include asSJstance from the Ia
1
2
P. 07
p~
,I
library sla!f in idemifying eenam legal Oct111lents. The rece· -1 of third parry lega, rna /"'rials] as
3 ,defi.ned abo,ve. oll1y applies to those correctional institutions which have a law library (Washington
I
•
I
4 : Slare PeniIendary. Wa.~hi ngLon Corrections Center.
eNei:l Island Correction, Center] ClalJ.am
5 ' Bay Corrections Center, Wash j ng(on SlaleeformaWry, Twin Rl ers Correc-tiOlls Center Ahway
J
Rcj8'hts Corrcc.tiom
~lc:r,
7
c.orrec:lions CenEl.;r).
Carr~
8
Qf
9
objectives. Defen lams agree toeuvcr approved 1 gal material
6
Washington
Cornx:tio~
Cener foC' 'omen, and Stafford Cree
I
ional mIT rncl
·:ng law library smffl re:i,eM!·e th right. to reject any
Lhe legal maleri Is defmoo a110ve if they are deemed
threaten legiimate pe ola,gical
0
itll0Ut
u due d:eIa ami pm ide
WTiuen notice of rejected mail items in accordance widl DOC Policy 450.100,
lO
n
h)
2
D~rem.lants agree
SL:mlp legal docllmems as
c)
3
tllat a process will be unpIemented whereby correctional staff will
"appro~ecl"
upon de ivety
0
the items to th inmate recipient.
Defendants also agree to permit irurmres he reee'va m abo e.-Ii ted. legal rna leria is
e insdtu ioml1 Jaw Hbrari s throughout the Sta e of W ,s it.glon for
14
to send such legal m:i. rials to
15
the purpo$ of filing those materials in l.aw library brief banks available for inmafes, The ocal
16
l stitudon.s
HX:Cl:
ing these mat,eriaJs rt'SerYC th.e rig! t to screen and r d~t the legal mal ri Is
[0
be
17 ' filed in their brief bank c:onsiSient wilh le iLimate penological ObjcctL cs. Dfemlao[s further agree
at to redact tho capti n or name
18
iLhin he legal materials filed in lhe brief banks of the .oeal
[9
jnstirutiona[ law libraries, provided that \he materials
20
penological ohj ecrives_
copy of Pri~aTl Legal ews dali!d lanuary 19, 1996. In
22
24
nm presenJ a threat to legitimate
Defendants agree 10 deFver to pI intiff.s BiUy Blankenship an ' Randy ToU fsen" a
21
23
0
I
ptcjudic~
e"XChaJlg~j
plaintiffs agreeu cUsmiss wuh
eir Nin h C]aim Or Reli f as staled i Plairuiffs l FirsE Amended and SupplemelllCd
Complains: for Declaratory and-Injunctive Relief. Phcintiffs
rorth~r
a.gree ro assjsr d fendanr.s in
25 ,proviuwg those relevant copie5 of Prison Legal News. if nece sary.
26
RELEASe A. D9E'lTLEMENT
AGR£EMENT
6
ATTOllNEV m::mll-"I.OS;- W
S~rNCiTON
Cdpnfllll JL.l: ~ oi..ilillTl
1'\0 !:lID, 4 I Hi
(1):.n I~. WA 9UC....I.lllG"
a
POO)
n~·1 ~4J
/
o
p Ii Y 50.100 I
vide otic
ft!'oo ants agree
l.1inli . j a eo
10
nismiss wltlJ
Ileml.ed nL1 Supplememed
"LEASE
AGREE E,l
6udice
0
JBim ror Decl Fatory
g:ree [
)
0
cJ
J
ry
no i c.
ti r Olli
J.
(0
7
I
i
. ill
P. [lg
FAX O.
OCT-Ol ~gg FRl 04: 47 PM
1
document! aDd tha. .rest af the mulLiple copies shall be returned to the sender, dOlmted~ or destroyed
2
m accordance with DOC Pelky 4 a.1OO? effective Jannary 10. 1999.
3
DefendanlS funhcr agree to amend DOC Policy 450.100, l\ofa' I ror Offenders,
2)
4
Section IV. Unaulhodzed Incoming Mail. A. 22 to provide for a limit of One magvJne artid>e per
5
,envelope from persons oilier lhan the publisher.
6
7
I
Dclcndll1ltg further agree to amemI DOC Polky 450.100" Mail fo
3)
Ofteulers,
Section IV, Unauthorized Incoming MnH. A. 23 to provide for a limit of ten (0) newsp.aper
I
8 , clipping8 per envelope. and these clippings may be received from perEons other than the publisher.
9
Defendants further agree there may be relevant portions of DOC POlicy 150,100,
3.
10
Mail for Offenders that need to be amended to reflec the p reposed changes ouU lned in this
1]
setrlement agre~nr. DefendantS agree ro provide plamtiffs. tlrrough ibeir anomeys of record.
12
with reasonable notice· Df proposed changes to DOC Policy 450.100" Mail for Offenders re.,')ulting
I
I
13
14
from this lawsuit only for rhe purpose of review and comment.
II is UDdcnitood and agreed by the parties that this settlement is Ifl compffillise o[ a
4.
]5
disputed claim, ana tlIat the consideration given J-l not (0 becorut etl as an .a:<lmi:ssioll of liability
16
on lhe part of any defendam. and tllar s.aid defendanls deny liab'li y.
J7
5.
Defendants agree to in.formally review a fair and reasonabJI: attorneys feesfcosls
}8
application submiucd by plaintiffs consi5tent with applicable law and applicable attorney f~S'
19
limitations rrtl.ndaled by Congress in the Prison LitiglUion Reform Act a 42
20
agreement an me amount of attomcys I fees a.ruI costs can be reached, defe:nd.:mts shaH pay such
2l
amount within 30 days of such agreement. If an agreement cannot be reached On <'IMrney fees and
22
costs, plaimiffs Shall have 60 days fQ,Uowing execution of tile fcf1Jl.fi!
23
which to submh a Bill of Costs and/or a mOlion fOT attorneys' f:ees to the Honorahle Judge
24
Burgess. Defendants wilJ then have (he opportunity to object to the Bill of Costs: and/or rno ion for
,_:I
attorneys' fees with full briefing before the court. Neither plaintiffs nor dflfenda.nts waive the right
.S.C. § 19'9'7e. If
Seuh!ln~nt
Agreement in
26
R.fiLEA.S~
ANlJ SbTi'Lf.MENT
AORE8\otENT
&
ATI'Ofu~ GENBM [. OP WA5!,!'INGTClN
Cnroaolil
Ibfd~ Dh'i3;[D!1
tl.nI4~ ~o 110
mjll1jlij, WII, ~~~e-..o[ ~6
(J6~} ~~G-l4~S.
I
i
I
I,
I
P.
FAX 0"
to
to appenJ the Pistrict CU1.1res decision as to (he amount of atlOmeys fees andlor costs award ... d in
2
3
this case by emering 'this agreemeDt.
6.
The parties will gign and present to the
COUrt
for entry a I Stipulation and Agr"...ed
4
Order of Dismissal Wilh Prejlldice~ to d.ismiss. aU pendmg litigation on this matter am ng: . laimiffs
5
and defendants, except the pmtic.s agree to
<6
prejudico.
7
7.
dismiss plaintiffs' Fifth Chim for Relief without
Defendants agree to comply with the terms of this agreement duriIlg B. 3D-month
R enforcement period. During this
30~moIltll
enforcement pedod, plain i£~ must :ltl:emp(
to
reJ -olve
9
any and all dispUles concerning the defendants' C(lotirrufng compliance with this 3!:t'l"CCmcnt through
10
the [o!lowirlg dispute resolution process. P aintiffs shaH 'infonn counsel for the DOC, Criminal
1]
Just-tee Divi.sion in writing of oy !lHGged subsmndal non-complia.nce.
12
resolved. at Ihat stagc, plaintiffs or counsel for plain iffs and counseL fDr me DOC
13 . confer in good faith
[0 tI)'
to
Unless the problem is
resolve any differences. This agreement does
DO [
wm
meet and
require pi aJnriffs t,o
14
exhaust DOC'.ii ad ()"Ii nistral ive gricva nee proces.'l prior to atttempting to re.solve any and all dtSp'Utes
15
lbrough (he alternatjve dispute resolmion process described. in this agreement.
16
cannm be
17
in a federal or Slate court of competent jurisdi\.ilOD. lo,c;:.ated within the geographic boundaries of the
a
re~olvcd by
meeting
and conferring,
then !he plaintiffs may pursue specific p~rfommncc .
1
Western District of Wa.shington on hehalF of the plaintiffs lo remedy any
19
agreement
20
8,
IfEhetspme
non~complia[1ce
whh this
The pn:::yaUlng party in any ac(on for spec.ific performance of !his agreement wn
21
be entitled to recover attorney fees and costs. consistent with. applicable law .and the Prison
22
LitigallQr1 Reform Acr. Each side wiU b(!M rheir own coots and attorney fees in pursuing a disput,e
23
res.olution process to resolve
24
agrcemem precludes the moe of any other typo of alternative dispute resolution process that tbe
25
parties agree to employ.
[}!1y
alleged non~compliance with this agreement.
othing in this
2{i,
RELEAS E AN D SEITLI!MJ3NT
AGREEMUNT
9
11TIORNEY GENElVi.T' OF WIlSlH IiN!G1"O
CfIIl'IiMI h"u i~ ni\'i~ijon
ro 1l4~ ~Ol16
WA 9iS04~H6
(J60} m·l44
Qly:npr~,.
Defendants agree to comply with the renDS of this agreement for 30-months,
9.
•
P. 11
FAX NO.
ccr-OI-gg FRI U4: 48 Pt1
2
beginning on the implementatkm dale specified in parn.graph 10 below t an to wai:ve ,their right, if :
3
any, to request or obtain lCnninaf:ion of this agreement prior 0 the oxpiration of the 30-month
~
enforcement period pursuant to i8
5
the expiration of the 30-month enforcement period, defendants .may petition
6
rnnnloation in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
7
case 18 U,S.C. § 3626(c)(l997)(as amended onoy. 26, 1997) shall apply. Plaintiffs may op_ Qse
8
defendant!:' motion for temlInation plh"Sua.rlt to 18 U.S,C. § 3626 (b)(3)(as amended 00 ·Qv. 26,
9
1997).
.S.C. § 3626(b)(2)(1997)(as amended on Nov. 26, 1997).
!
~
J626(b)(1)(asamendcdon Nov. 26 1
Plaintiffs; opposition uuder 18 U.S.C. § 3626(b)(3) to terminate shall be limired to
10
plaintiffs' claims where relief was obt.uned through provls'ons of this Release and Settlement·
11
Agreement.
12
On or by rilme months frorn the dare this agreem.eIlt is signed, the defendants shall
10.
13
implement this agreement, including the amendmsnr to DOC Policy 450.100. proposed
14
amendments to W C 137-28-220 and WAC 137-28-260, and all other injunctive reli f obtained by
15
plaintiffs through t:h is agreement.
16
This document is not a c.onsent decree, but it is an agreement enfurceab1 through
11.
3
17
the contractual remed ies spec j !ie<.!., hereiu.
18
shOldd be construed as creating or e;ttiDguishing
19
interests.
20
one of the provi.41lons contained in this agreement
any state or federal crea.red con. tiruUonal
This agreement COrlslitures rno fmal wril12n expression of all [he terms of se ement
12.
21
and is a complete aru.I exclusive statement of those terms. No oilier agreements, in writincr or oral
22
bind the parties.
The undersigned hereby declare the temt.'i of [his settlement
,~greemcnt
23
13.
24
completely
25
final and binding compromise, adjustment and settlement qf any and all claims. disputed or
26
orhenvise.
r~.ad,
RELEASE A 0
AGREEMENT
wholly understood and voluntarily accepted for the purpose of making a
s'~:rrU~Mc
T
10
fun and
ATIOR..·{BY GF.Nf.lV.l . OF ...."iI·uNmON
C(imilNll ;u~li~ Thy' in
1'O~4(j1 [~
0l~ln~j3, WA 9~S(l,f"'11 G
(~) .~~ ·l445
are •
.-
~q
FAX 0..
P. l2
:
-, ,
2
3
14.
This agreement may be signed in counterpa.rt otigio~Js and
way b£i delivered by.
facsimile with Qriginals to follow,
4
DATED this
5
For Plalntiffs~
Itt' day o[October, 1999.
7 '
~{) ~. ~~_.
8
...
9
WSBA No
10
11
7'"
~~(J~~~
For Defendants:
1!J/.!./11_
Date
5236
Authorized to Sign by and for AU Plaintiffs
_~/O/Jtti
..
nate
l2
KAS .
.
WSDA No. 27100
Assistant Attorney General
13
~~Ldh9
14
IS
. A11 .
E1
ate"
.
WSBA No. 27531
Ass istam Attorney General
16
17
18
1rlrC'HAELT. :MITCHEL[
19
WSEA No. 6088
Sr. Assis[ant Attorney General
20
AUmneys
fOf
Date
Defendants
2i
22
23
ELDON VAlL
24
Deputy Secretary
DeiJ artment 0 f Corrections
Date
25
26
RF.Lf.AS E AN D S[;;,nLEM ENT
AGREEAl!NT
11
"'!TO·EU'ffi;'{ CLttaJI L. 0[' WAI;HINCiTON
erEmlrlal Ju.1J I~ DJ',IhIQll
I'O!lI};ll~IlII15
O~ill, WA 9 ~a .01 Mi
OoSO) ~!6-1 oH'







