Skip navigation
The Habeas Citebook: Prosecutorial Misconduct - Header

Editorial opposing CoreCivic's membership in the Nashville LGBT Chamber of Commerce

Nashville Scene, Oct. 6, 2019.

Letter: Oppose CoreCivic


A couple of weeks ago, Out & About Nashville published an editorial letter by its managing editor James Grady opposing CoreCivic’s membership in the Nashville LGBT Chamber. Leading up to the Chamber’s discussion of this issue on Tuesday, Alex Friedmann, associate director of the Human Rights Defense Center and managing editor of Prison Legal News, submitted the following letter:


To the Editor:

On September 13, Out & About published an editorial concerning the Nashville LGBT Chamber of Commerce’s decision to accept as a member one of the nation’s largest for-profit prison companies, CoreCivic (formerly Corrections Corporation of America, or CXW on the New York Stock Exchange).

Since then, as a former prisoner who served six years at a CoreCivic-run facility in the 1990s, and as a long-time supporter of the LGBTQ community, I’ve been waiting to hear more about that issue. Instead there has been a disturbing silence.

To be clear and for full disclosure, I’m opposed to private prisons that incarcerate people for the purpose of generating corporate profit. Having served time at a CoreCivic facility, I have empirical experience; I have also researched and reported on private prisons for the past 20 years, am now a national expert on that topic, and have testified before state legislative committees and members of Congress.

There is much to criticize about for-profit prisons, from higher rates of violence and higher recidivism rates to the fact that private prison companies are primarily in the business of making money – not rehabilitating prisoners, providing a public service or ensuring public safety. Then there is the somewhat idealistic notion that our criminal justice system should not be for sale to corporate interests.

Nor does the private prison industry, including CoreCivic, have a stellar track record with respect to the LGBTQ community. For example, a transgender woman testified before Tennessee state lawmakers earlier this year about her treatment at CoreCivic’s Trousdale-Turner prison northeast of Nashville, which included assaults, sexual harassment by staff and denial of medical care.

Last July, transgender immigrant detainees held at a CoreCivic facility in New Mexico reported poor conditions that included inadequate medical care and verbal abuse by staff.

Previously, the ACLU filed suit on behalf of a transgender woman who was “intimidated, harassed and sexually assaulted” by a CoreCivic guard at a detention facility in Arizona.

And according to a September 25, 2019 press release, “Today, Transgender Law Center (TLC), Black LGBTQIA+ Migrant Project (BLMP), Center for American Progress, along with 11 other LGBTQ, civil rights and immigration justice organizations, submitted a complaint on behalf of current and formerly detained lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer individuals and people living with HIV (LGBTQ, PLWHIV) against CoreCivic, GEO Group, LaSalle Corrections, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), holding them responsible for jeopardizing their health, safety, and lives while in immigration detention.” (GEO Group and LaSalle are other private prison companies.)

Research on prison rape and sexual assault indicates that LGBTQ prisoners are more likely to experience sexual abuse while incarcerated. As an activist investor who owns a small amount of stock in CoreCivic, I introduced a shareholder resolution in 2011 to require the company to issue bi-annual reports on its efforts to reduce incidents of rape and sexual abuse in its facilities. CoreCivic’s board of directors voted unanimously to oppose my resolution, and fought vigorously before the SEC to prevent it from going before shareholders. When that effort failed, the company then successfully urged shareholders to vote against it.

Given this history specific to the LGBTQ community, much of which can be found through a few quick Google searches, it’s odd that the Nashville LGBT Chamber of Commerce would embrace a company like CoreCivic as a member. Then again, as the name suggests, the Chamber is mostly concerned about commerce; i.e., business. And apparently it isn’t picky about the nature of that business, which in this case is for-profit incarceration that includes a history of mistreatment of LGBTQ prisoners.

What is more likely? That CoreCivic, founded in 1983, has suddenly decided to be a supporter of LGBTQ interests and has joined the Nashville Chamber for that purpose, or that the company is engaged in reputation laundering, whereby it joins, donates to or sponsors non-profits to burnish its tarnished image. My money (no pun intended) is on the latter. And when organizations like the Nashville Chamber accept private prison money – which is generated from locking people up, including gay, lesbian and transgender people – they are essentially selling the legitimacy and respectability that CoreCivic is buying, and are consequently complicit in the private prison industry.

The Nashville LGBT Chamber can and should do better, and the LGBTQ community deserves more from organizations that claim to represent their interests.

This issue will be discussed at an open meeting on Tuesday, October 8, at 6:00 p.m. at the Holy Trinity Community Church, 6727 Charlotte Pike #4235, Nashville, TN 37209. I’ll be out of town and can’t be there, and encourage others to attend and speak out against CoreCivic’s membership. Can’t make the meeting? You can sign this petition against the Nashville LGBT Chamber’s decision to accept CoreCivic as a member.

Friedmann has no affiliation or involvement with the “Stop CoreCivic” petition.


Follow-up note: The Nashville LGBT Chamber rescinded CoreCivic's membership following the community meeting held on Oct. 8, 2019.

The Habeas Citebook: Prosecutorial Misconduct Side
PLN Subscribe Now Ad 450x450
The Habeas Citebook: Prosecutorial Misconduct Footer