Skip navigation
The Habeas Citebook Ineffective Counsel - Header

Joint letter re Immigration and Customs Enforcement policies - October 2016

Download original document:
Brief thumbnail
This text is machine-read, and may contain errors. Check the original document to verify accuracy.
October 11, 2016
Jeh Johnson
Secretary of Homeland Security
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
3801 Nebraska Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20528
Dear Secretary Johnson:
Immigrants’ rights, civil rights, and government-openness organizations write to express
grave concerns about recent statements on private prisons and detention contracting made
by Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director (ICE) Sarah Saldaña to members of
the House Judiciary Committee during the ICE oversight hearing on September 22, 2016.
Director Saldaña stated that ICE’s prisons and jails are “almost completely contractor
run” and that closing private prisons or reducing contracting would “turn our system
upside down.”1 She also failed to acknowledge the systemic and frequent failures in the
care and management of detained immigrants in ICE’s outsourced network of detention
facilities, despite numerous reports by government agencies, non-governmental
organizations (NGOs), and journalists documenting these failures. Additionally, since
the beginning of her tenure, Director Saldaña has failed to personally engage community
stakeholders and instead, argues that the detention system ICE operates is somehow
insulated and protected from the same problems plaguing private and public prisons and
jails across the country.
That Director Saldaña’s rejection of changes to ICE’s detention contracting practices
came just weeks after you directed the Homeland Security Advisory Council to convene
a Privatized Immigration Detention Facilities Subcommittee (“HSAC Subcommittee”) is,
quite frankly, shocking. As twelve U.S. Senators pointed out in a recent letter, the fact
that Director Saldaña felt so comfortable preemptively rejecting any reforms in this area
raises serious questions of whether the HSAC Subcommittee’s review is a genuine
process.2
The Director’s remarks heighten our existing concerns about the HSAC Subcommittee
process. The individuals on the Subcommittee are almost universally comprised of
former employees or directors of law enforcement, national security or military sectors.3

1

House Committee on the Judiciary. Oversight of United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement,
September 22, 2016. 114th Cong. 2nd sess., https://judiciary.house.gov/hearing/oversight-united-statesimmigration-customs-enforcement/, last visited 9/28/2016.
2
Letter from Sen. Patrick Leahy, et al., to DHS Sec. Jeh Johnson (Sept. 26, 2016).
3
Department of Homeland Security, Homeland Security Advisory Council Privatized Immigration
Detention Facilities Subcommittee Membership List (2016), available at
https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Privatized%20Immigration%20Detention%20Facilities
%20Subcommittee%20Membership%20List%209%2016%2016_0.pdf.

The review process itself remains unclear, and the HSAC has not communicated its plan
for consultation with the public.
Although the Subcommittee did meet with a small number of organizations earlier this
week, the meeting was on very short notice, lasted only an hour, and did not include
critical stakeholders, including most of the organizations involved in collecting over
200,000 signatures from individuals calling for an end to the privatization of immigration
detention.4 Most importantly, the Subcommittee has not stated whether it will solicit
input directly from detained and formerly detained immigrants themselves.
We further urge you to direct the HSAC Subcommittee to consider other changes to DHS
policies and practices that would facilitate ending its private prison contracts, including
measures to reduce detention and implement safeguards to ensure humane conditions. As
the Deputy Attorney General’s August 18, 2016 memorandum on DOJ’s private prison
phase-out made clear, DOJ’s commitment to ending its private prison contracts goes hand
in hand with its decision to adopt smarter sentencing practices that reduce the federal
population.5 If DHS seeks to follow in DOJ’s footsteps, analogous detention reforms will
need to be a part of its plan. However, the HSAC Subcommittee has already indicated
that it does not consider this crucial topic to be within its purview.
We are hopeful that your office does not view this process as having a foregone
conclusion, and we would like to meet with you immediately to discuss the ongoing
review process. Please feel free to contact Mary Small at
msmall@detentionwatchnetwork.org or Paromita Shah at paromita@nipnlg.org.
Sincerely,
Alianza Americas
Capital Area Immigrants’ Rights Coalition
Center for Gender & Refugee Studies
Church World Service
Community Initiatives for Visiting Immigrants in Confinement (CIVIC)
Detention Watch Network
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS)
Human Rights Defense Center
Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights (ICIRR)
Immigrant Legal Resource Center (ILRC)
Mijente
National Council of Jewish Women, Inc.
National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC)
Rafi Schwartz, “Former immigrant detainees confronted the Secretary of Homeland Security about the
private prison industry,” Fusion (Sept. 29, 2016), available at http://fusion.net/story/352294/jeh-johnsonice-detention-prison-dhs/
5
Memorandum from Sally Yates, Deputy Attorney General, Reducing Our Use of Private Prisons, Aug.
18, 2016, available at https://www.justice.gov/opa/file/886311/download
.
4

National Immigration Law Center (NILC)
National Immigration Project of the NLG (NIPNLG)
Not One More Deportation Campaign
NWDC Resistance and Latino Advocacy
OpenTheGovernment.org
Presente.org
Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services (RAICES)
Southern Poverty Law Center
United We Dream
U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants
We Belong Together

 

 

Disciplinary Self-Help Litigation Manual - Side
Advertise Here 2nd Ad
Prison Profiteers - Side