Skip navigation
CLN bookstore

Articles by David M. Reutter

Louisiana Supreme Court Declares Unconstitutional Statute Stripping Courts of Authority to Order Payment of Indigent Defense Expert Funds, Holding the Law Infringes on Judiciary’s Constitutionally Granted Jurisdiction Over Felony Cases

by David M. Reutter

The Supreme Court of Louisiana affirmed a district court’s ruling that La. R.S. 15:168(E)(3), which declares that no court “shall have jurisdiction to order the payment of any funds administered by the office or district public defender for expert witnesses, or for any other …

Supreme Court of Maryland Holds Officer Lacked Reasonable Suspicion for Traffic Stop Based on Acquaintance’s Tip Reporting Innocent Conduct, Reaffirming That “High-Crime Area” Testimony Must Be Particularized

by David M. Reutter

The Supreme Court of Maryland unanimously reversed the judgment of the Appellate Court, holding that a police officer lacked reasonable suspicion under the totality of the circumstances to stop Xavier S. Kopp’s vehicle. The Court concluded that a tip from the officer’s personal acquaintance …

Oregon Supreme Court Announces Witness Competency Under OEC 601 Depends on General Capacity to Be a Witness, Not Ability to Recall a Specific Fact

by David M. Reutter

The Supreme Court of Oregon held that the competency requirement of OEC 601 asks only whether a person possesses sufficient general capacity to perceive, recollect, and communicate so as to serve as a witness at all, and it does not authorize a trial court …

Minnesota Supreme Court Announces Heightened Voluntariness Inquiry Required for Contingent Guilty Pleas and Holds Plea Withdrawal Is the Proper Remedy When District Court Fails to Probe Coercion Risk

by David M. Reutter

The Supreme Court of Minnesota held that district courts must conduct a heightened inquiry, beyond the standard colloquy prescribed by Minnesota Rule of Criminal Procedure 15.01, into potential coercion before accepting a contingent guilty plea, in which a defendant pleads guilty in exchange for …

Florida Supreme Court Announces “Results” of Postconviction DNA Testing Under § 925.11 Include Underlying Testing Data Necessary for Expert Analysis, Holding That No Additional Burden Applies Once a Motion for Testing Has Been Granted

by David M. Reutter

The Supreme Court of Florida reversed a circuit court order that had denied a death-sentenced prisoner access to the underlying data generated during postconviction DNA testing. The Court held that the “results” a defendant is entitled to receive under § 925.11(2)(i), Florida Statutes, and …

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Announces Calling Known Recalcitrant Witness Before Jury Constitutes Reversible Error and Prosecutorial Misconduct Regardless of Whether Witness Expressly Invokes Fifth Amendment Privilege, Qualifying Contrary Precedent

by David M. Reutter

In a unanimous opinion the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that a prosecutor commits misconduct, and reversible error occurs, when the prosecutor summons and questions a witness before a jury despite having clear reason to expect the witness will refuse to answer questions, regardless …

First Circuit Vacates Drug Courier’s Sentence, Holding District Court Erred by Failing to Conduct Proper Comparative Culpability Analysis Under § 3B1.2 When It Excluded Other Participants in Drug Shipment From Universe of Comparators

by David M. Reutter

The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that a District Court commits reversible error when, in assessing a defendant’s eligibility for a mitigating-role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, it restricts the universe of participants solely to the defendant’s own conduct …

Ohio Supreme Court: Constitutionality of Indeterminate Sentence Under Reagan Tokes Law May Be Challenged on Direct Appeal

by David M. Reutter

The Supreme Court of Ohio held that the constitutionality of an indeterminate sentence imposed under the Reagan Tokes Law, R.C. 2967.271, ripens at sentencing and that the law may be challenged on direct appeal. 

Eddie Maddox entered guilty pleas on September 30, 2019, …

Idaho Supreme Court: Telephonic Testimony Violated Defendant’s Sixth Amendment Right to Confrontation

by David M. Reutter

The Supreme Court of Idaho held that an expert’s telephonic testimony violated a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confrontation. The Court found the error was not harmless and remanded for further proceedings.

Tyler Clapp was stopped on July 6, 2018, after being observed …

Supreme Court of Iowa: Sentence Vacated Because Prosecution Failed to Follow Spirit of Plea Agreement Requiring Recommendation of Suspended Sentence

by David M. Reutter

The Supreme Court of Iowa vacated a defendant’s sentence after finding the prosecution failed to honor the spirit of a plea agreement requiring that it recommend a suspended sentence.

Shane Michael Davis pleaded guilty on November 25, 2019, after reaching a plea agreement …

 

 

Disciplinary Self-Help Litigation Manual - Side
Advertise Here 4th Ad
The Habeas Citebook Ineffective Counsel Side