Skip navigation
PYHS - Header

Articles by Richard Resch

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Announces Postconviction Forensic Testing Statute Permits Digital Forensic Analysis of Cellphones, Holding Chapter 278A Not Limited to Tangible Evidence Testable for Biological Material

by Richard Resch

The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts unanimously held that G. L. c. 278A (“Act”), the Commonwealth’s postconviction forensic testing statute, permits digital forensic analysis of a cellphone. The Court rejected the Commonwealth’s contention that the Act applies only to laboratory testing of tangible items testable …

Relevant Conduct: How Federal Sentencing Law Punishes More Than the Crime of Conviction

by Richard Resch

Few features of the federal sentencing system have as much practical impact on defendants’ sentences as the issue of relevant conduct. Codified at §1B1.3 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, the relevant conduct provision determines which acts and omissions a court may consider when calculating …

New Mexico Supreme Court Announces Article II, Section 10 Exclusionary Rule Governs Admissibility of Evidence Seized Outside State by Non-New Mexico Officers

by Richard Resch

On an issue of first impression, the Supreme Court of New Mexico unanimously held that Article II, Section 10 of the New Mexico Constitution and its exclusionary rule govern the admissibility of evidence in New Mexico courts even where that evidence was seized in another …

Surveillance for Sale: The Data Broker Loophole and the Fourth Amendment After Chatrie

by Richard Resch

Jake Laperruque of the Center for Democracy and Technology offered a blunt analogy in a March 2026 NPR interview. Imagine the police want to search your home but lack a warrant. Instead of going to a judge, they hand your landlord a hundred dollars for …

Retroactive Guideline Amendments: The Narrow Path to a Federal Sentence Reduction

by Richard Resch

When the United States Sentencing Commission lowers a Guideline range, the revision ordinarily applies only to defendants sentenced after the effective date. For the thousands of people already serving sentences calculated under the old, harsher Guideline range, the change might seem irrelevant. But a motion …

SCOTUS Announces Accessing Google Location History Data Constitutes a Fourth Amendment Search, Holding That Neither Brief Duration Nor Third-Party Storage Negates Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Cellphone Location Information

by Richard Resch

The Supreme Court of the United States held that police officers conducted a Fourth Amendment search when they acquired a criminal suspect’s Google Location History data through a geofence warrant, concluding that individuals maintain a reasonable expectation of privacy in records documenting their cellphone’s whereabouts. …

Your DNA Was at the Scene, But You Weren’t: How Touch DNA Is Convicting the Innocent

The Gold Standard That Isn’t

On the night of November 29, 2012, a group of men broke into a mansion in Monte Sereno, California, and killed its owner, Raveesh Kumra, a 66-year-old Silicon Valley investor. When the county crime lab processed evidence from the …

U.S. Sentencing Commission: 2026 Amendments to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines

by Richard Resch

On April 16, 2026, the United States Sentencing Commission (“Commission”) voted to promulgate seven amendments to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”), all having a proposed effective date of November 1, 2026. These amendments span drug offenses, inflationary adjustments to monetary tables, a major overhaul of …

SCOTUS Announces Sentencing Disparities Created by Nonretroactive Statutory Amendments Cannot Constitute Extraordinary and Compelling Reasons for Compassionate Release

by Richard Resch

Resolving a circuit split, the Supreme Court of the United States held that when Congress declines to make a sentencing amendment retroactive, the resulting disparity between old and new sentences cannot serve as an “extraordinary and compelling” reason warranting a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. …

Beyond Geofence Warrants: Chatrie, Reverse-Location Surveillance, and the Fourth Amendment Fight Over Digital Dragnets

by Richard Resch

In December 2023, Google announced that Location History would be migrated from its servers to users’ devices, a change that would effectively end the company’s role as the principal recipient of law-enforcement demands for mass location data and render obsolete the centralized database (known internally …

 

 

Federal Prison Handbook - Side
CLN Subscribe Now Ad
CLN Subscribe Now Ad 450x600