Skip navigation
Criminal Legal News
CLN bookstore
× You have 2 more free articles available this month. Subscribe today.

New York Court Rules Police Allowed to Use Familial DNA Searches

Loaded on Dec. 15, 2023 by Jordan Arizmendi published in Criminal Legal News December, 2023, page 33
Filed under: DNA Testing/Samples, DNA Evidence. Location: New York.

by Jordan Arizmendi

In 2022, a New York court barred law enforcement from using familial DNA searches (“FDS”). According to the court, the state’s regulations for FDS were invalid because they first needed to be approved by the state legislature.

However, on October 24, 2023, the New York Court of Appeals (the state’s highest court) reversed the previous decision, ruling that New York law enforcement may resume investigating crimes using FDS.

No question, FDS is a very powerful and effective tool for law enforcement. With a few drops of DNA, FDS enables law enforcement to search massive DNA databases of convicted criminals. Despite its usefulness in solving crimes, FDS also raises serious privacy concerns. Opponents of FDS argue that the forensic technique is yet another form of mass surveillance and a violation of the Fourth Amendment.

When a person’s DNA gets put into a DNA database, the DNA of all of their close biological relatives are also included and searchable. The 2022 case that resulted in New York suspending law enforcement’s usage of FDS was brought by two men with brothers who had been convicted of crimes. Their argument was that because of their brothers’ crimes, law enforcement searches could improperly target them.

FDS should not be confused with Forensic Genetic Genealogy (“FGG”). As consumer DNA testing has become very popular, an enormous genetic genealogy database has been produced, in which law enforcement uses to identify a human. FGG was used to capture the Golden State Killer. The difference between the two is that FDS is a deliberate search of a criminal database for a specific DNA profile.  

 

Source: ForensicMag

[Note: The case is published at Respondents v. New York State Div. of Criminal Justice Servs. (In re Stevens), 2023 N.Y. LEXIS 1824, 2023 NY Slip Op 05351, 2023 WL 6983470 (Court of Appeals of New York October 24, 2023, Decided).]

As a digital subscriber to Criminal Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

Related legal case

Respondents v. New York State Div. of Criminal Justice Servs. (In re Stevens)

Year2023
Cite2023 N.Y. LEXIS 1824, 2023 NY Slip Op 05351, 2023 WL 6983470 (Court of Appeals of New York October 24, 2023)
LevelState Supreme Court

More from this issue:

  1. Dangerous Encounters: Interactions Between Autistic Individuals and Law Enforcement, by Casey Bastian
  2. Louisiana Sheriffs Repeatedly and Conveniently Destroy Public Records, by Benjamin Tschirhart
  3. Natural Language Processing Software Can Identify Biased Jury Selection, Has Potential to Be Used in Real Time During Voir Dire, by Jo Ellen Nott
  4. Eleventh Circuit Announces Defendant May Not Be Sentenced to Home Confinement for Violating Terms of Supervised Release When Sentenced to Statutory Maximum Period of Imprisonment for the Violation, by Douglas Ankney
  5. CBP Promises Not to Buy Location Data – But Is It a Hollow Promise?, by Michael Thompson
  6. Use of Forensic Genetic Genealogy Searches to Identify Suspects Needs Regulation and Can Be Challenged, by Matthew Clarke
  7. Chicago Cop Lied So Many Times Under Oath That Prosecutors Are Dismissing Cases That Relied on His Testimony, by Jordan Arizmendi
  8. Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Clarifies Application of ‘Estoppel’ in Plea Bargain Context and Holds Trial Court Lacked Jurisdiction to Revoke Community Supervision After Statutory Term Expired, by Richard Resch
  9. Report Finds Effective Text Message Reminders Can Reduce Community Supervision Violations, by Jordan Arizmendi
  10. Third Circuit: Pennsylvania Conviction for First-Degree Aggravated Assault Does Not Require Physical Force so Is Not Qualifying Predicate for ACCA Purposes, by Douglas Ankney
  11. First Circuit: Justification for Upward Sentencing Departure Following Supervised Release Revocation Must Be Ade-quately Explained, by Matthew Clarke
  12. Sixth Circuit: District Court Committed Procedural Error by Impermissibly Ceding Its Discretion to Congress to Determine Guidelines’ Crack-to-Powder Ratio at Sentencing, by David Reutter
  13. Indiana Supreme Court Reverses Involuntary Manslaughter Conviction Where Trial Court Denied Defense Counsel Opportunity to Directly Voir Dire Prospective Jurors, by Douglas Ankney
  14. We the Targeted: How the Government Weaponizes Surveillance to Silence its Critics 2372, by Nisha Whitehead, John W. Whitehead
  15. Fourth Circuit: Disparate Sentence of 30 Years for Two § 924(c) Convictions Constitutes ‘Extraordinary and Compelling Reason’ for Early Release and § 3553(a) Sentencing Factors ‘Overwhelmingly’ Favor Sentence Reduction, by Douglas Ankney
  16. Massachusetts Supreme Court: Defense Counsel’s Overt Bias Against Own Client Constitutes Actual Conflict of Interest Requiring New Trial Without Need to Prove Prejudice, by Anthony Accurso
  17. New Mexico Ends Juvenile Life Without Parole, Retroactively Applies Rule to Previously Convicted Minors, by Anthony Accurso
  18. Fourth Circuit Reverses § 924(c) Conviction Because Kidnapping No Longer Qualifies as Predicate Offense and ‘Critical Record Documents’ Do Not Show Firearm Charge Was ‘Expressly Predicated Upon’ Any Other Offense, by Douglas Ankney
  19. New York Court Rules Police Allowed to Use Familial DNA Searches, by Jordan Arizmendi
  20. Texas Using Highly Sophisticated Israeli Phone Tracking Software, by Jo Ellen Nott
  21. ‘Criminal Courteaucracy’: Understanding the Unique Role of Criminal Court Administrators in Implementing Social Con-troll, by David Reutter
  22. Fifth Circuit: Fourth Amendment Seizure Occurred When Officer Pulled Behind Parked Vehicle, Activated Emergency Lights, and Simultaneously Ordered Suspect to Remain in Vehicle, by Douglas Ankney
  23. The EFF Is Tackling Border Towers, Facilitating Research into Impact of Mass Surveillance, by Anthony Accurso
  24. Kentucky Supreme Court Clarifies When Lesser-Included Offense Instruction Must Be Provided, Reverses Convictions Based on Trial Court’s Failure to Properly Instruct Jury, by Matthew Clarke
  25. After Mississippi Supreme Court Announcement, Courts Unprepared to Ensure Poor Defendants Have a Lawyer Throughout the Criminal Process, by Jo Ellen Nott
  26. Seventh Circuit Announces Procedures for Addressing ‘Facially Questionable Warrant’ Due to ‘Material Handwritten Alterations’ Unsigned or Initialed by Issuing Judge, by Richard Resch
  27. California Supreme Court Reinstates Petition for Resentencing Under SB 1437 Because Trial Court Misapprehended Le-gal Requirements for Proving Aiding and Abetting Implied Malice Murder, by Matthew Clarke
  28. Maine Supreme Judicial Court Announces Clarification of Test for Violation of Right to Speedy Trial Under Maine Constitu-tion, by David Reutter
  29. Sixth Circuit: Because Ohio’s Aggravated Robbery Statute Does Not Contain Mens Rea Requirement, Conviction Is Violent Felony Under ACCA Only if Underlying Theft in Robbery Contains Required Mens Rea, by Douglas Ankney
  30. News in Brief

More from Jordan Arizmendi:

More from these topics:

 

 

Prisoner Education Guide side
PLN Subscribe Now Ad 450x450
The Habeas Citebook: Prosecutorial Misconduct Side