From Witness Descriptions to Digital Mugshots: AI’s Growing Role in Policing
Police departments across the United States are increasingly using artificial intelligence (“AI”) to generate composite sketches of suspects based on witness descriptions, accelerating an investigative process that once relied solely on human artists.
The adoption of AI in law enforcement spans multiple domains. In Chicago, algorithms help identify potential crime hotspots to allocate police resources. The New York Police Department employs “ShotSpotter,” a system that monitors street sounds and uses AI to detect possible gunfire. Meanwhile, the Miami Police Department uses Clearview AI, a facial recognition tool that scours billions of online images to match suspect photos. Many agencies also rely on AI to analyze DNA evidence. These technologies, while often helpful, operate on largely opaque systems, raising concerns about accountability and accuracy.
New programs, such as Anthropic’s Forensic Sketch AI-rtist, allow police to generate highly detailed suspect images from witness descriptions and refine them in real time. While sketch artists have long assisted investigations, AI can produce near-photorealistic renderings in minutes.
One recent case in Goodyear, Arizona, illustrates the technology’s potential—and its uncertainties. Authorities used AI to create a composite of a man accused of attempting to abduct a teenage girl in a suburban neighborhood. According to police, the suspect tried to grab the girl’s arm before she escaped and called 911. The resulting AI-generated sketch was strikingly lifelike.
Such cases underscore broader tensions surrounding AI in policing. Law enforcement officials, judges, and even developers often lack a clear understanding of how these systems function. The algorithms driving them are frequently inscrutable, and regulatory oversight remains underdeveloped. Legal experts warn that courts will face difficult questions: How much weight should be given to AI-generated evidence when its accuracy is unproven? What qualifications are needed to assess these “black box” tools? And what safeguards should govern their use?
The rise of AI in policing marks a pivotal shift in criminal investigations, offering unprecedented speed and precision—but at a cost. As these tools evolve, so too must the legal and ethical frameworks that govern them. Without transparency, oversight, and public debate, the very technology meant to ensure safety risks eroding trust in the justice system. The question is no longer whether AI will shape law enforcement, but whether society can shape its use before it’s too late.
Sources: bbc.com, theaitrack.com
As a digital subscriber to Criminal Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
