Skip navigation
PYHS - Header

Articles by David Kim

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court: Amending Indictment to Change Subsections of Aggravated Child Rape Statute Constitutes an Impermissible Substantive Amendment

by David Kim

The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts unanimously held that amending an indictment to change the subsection of the aggravated child rape statute under which a defendant was charged constituted an impermissible substantive amendment that violated Article 12 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights. Reversing the …

Oregon Supreme Court Announces Article I, Section 9, of State Constitution Protects Privacy in Internet Browsing Conducted Over Public Wi-Fi Networks

by David Kim

In an en banc decision, the Supreme Court of Oregon held that Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution protects an individual’s privacy in internet browsing activities even when that individual accesses the internet through a publicly available Wi-Fi network operated by a third …

Indiana Supreme Court Clarifies “Single Statutory Offense” for Substantive Double Jeopardy Analysis, Holding Powell Test Governs Multiple Convictions Under Elevated Forms of Common Base Offense

by David Kim

The Supreme Court of Indiana held that when a criminal statute defines a base offense with elevated forms at higher penalty levels, those elevated forms constitute a single statutory offense for substantive double jeopardy purposes, requiring application of the Powell multiplicity test rather than the …

SCOTUS Announces Sentencing Reform Act Does Not Authorize Automatic Extension of Supervised Release When Defendant Absconds, Resolving Circuit Split

by David Kim

In an 8-1 decision authored by Justice Gorsuch, the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 does not authorize courts to automatically extend a defendant’s term of supervised release when the defendant fails to report to a probation …

Fifth Circuit Announces Long Vehicle Protective-Search Exception Requires Contemporaneous Facts Demonstrating Third Party’s Potential Dangerousness Before Warrantless Vehicle Search Is Permissible

by David Kim

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that a warrantless protective search of a vehicle under Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983) (sometimes described as a vehicle “protective sweep”), violated the Fourth Amendment where officers failed to identify any fact …

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Two-Year Statute of Limitations Governs All § 1983 Claims Arising in West Virginia, Regardless of Underlying Tort or Survivability

by David Kim

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that all 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims arising in West Virginia are subject to a two-year statute of limitations under West Virginia Code § 55-2-12(b), resolving inconsistent applications by U.S. District Courts in that …

Montana Supreme Court: Due Process Prohibits Courts From Relying on Unproven Charging Allegations When Imposing Sex Offender Registration Duty, Announces First-Impression Rule Limiting Review to Elements of Conviction

by David Kim

In a matter of first impression, the Supreme Court of Montana unanimously reversed a district court order that would have required a defendant to register as a sex offender based on allegations contained in charging documents that were never proved beyond a reasonable doubt or …

Eleventh Circuit Announces Hobbs Act Robbery Requires Force Before or During Taking, Reversing Conviction Where Defendant Used Force Only After Co-Conspirator Had Surreptitiously Stolen Property and Departed

by David Kim

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that a taking of property does not qualify as robbery under the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a), unless force or threatened force is employed before or during the taking itself. The Court ruled …

Second Circuit Holds Exclusion of Evidence Corroborating Defendant’s Testimony About Third-Party Statements Bearing on Intent Was Error, Clarifying That Rule 404(b) Does Not Bar Non-Propensity Evidence Offered to Support Credibility

by David Kim

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated a cocaine-importation conspiracy conviction, holding that the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York erred in excluding undisputed evidence that the defendant’s coworker had twice previously provided information to the Colombian …

Oregon Supreme Court Announces Bright-Line Rule Requiring Dismissal Without Prejudice When State Fails to Appoint Counsel for Eligible Criminal Defendant Within 60 Days in Misdemeanor Cases or 90 Days in Felony Cases Post-Arraignment

by David Kim

The Supreme Court of Oregon held that the State violates Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution when it fails to appoint counsel for an eligible criminal defendant for an extended period following arraignment. The Court established a bright-line rule under which dismissal of …

 

 

Prison Profiteers - Side
Advertise Here 3rd Ad
CLN Subscribe Now Ad 450x600