Skip navigation
Raymond Lumsden

Articles by David Kim

New Jersey Supreme Court Announces Historical CSLI Must Be Presented Through Expert Testimony, Rejecting Lay Mapping of Cell-Tower Locations Because Interpreting CSLI Requires Technical and Specialized Knowledge Beyond “Ken” of Average Juror

by David Kim

The Supreme Court of New Jersey unanimously held that historical cell site location information (“CSLI”) may not be presented to a jury through a lay witness. Instead, because CSLI carries probative force only when the jury understands how cell towers and cellphones interact, the Court …

Chronotype Mismatch as an Emerging Vulnerability Factor in Custodial Confessions

by David Kim

A man is arrested late on a Friday night and held overnight. By morning, detectives are ready to talk. He slept a few hours in the holding cell. He has not been awake for 24 straight hours. No one denied him food or water. At …

Oregon Supreme Court Announces Trial Courts Must Give Complete Oral Final Jury Instructions at Conclusion of Trial, Preliminary Instructions Cannot Substitute for the ORCP 59 B Charge

by David Kim

The Supreme Court of Oregon, sitting en banc, held that Oregon Rule of Civil Procedure (“ORCP”) 59 B, which applies in criminal cases through ORS 136.330, requires a trial court, at the conclusion of trial and before the jury retires to deliberate, to orally state …

Colorado Supreme Court Holds Prosecutor’s Interlocutory Appeal of Evidentiary Ruling Lacked Arguable Merit, Did Not Toll Speedy Trial Deadline, and Violated Defendant’s Right to Speedy Trial

by David Kim

The Supreme Court of Colorado, sitting en banc, unanimously held that the prosecution’s second pretrial appeal, challenging a county court evidentiary ruling under CRE 401, 402, and 403, did not qualify as an “interlocutory appeal” under Colorado’s speedy trial statute because the prosecution’s assertion that …

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Holds Grand Jury No-Bill Terminated Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel, Clarifies Frye Exception

by David Kim

The Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas reversed a suppression order and held that a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel terminates when charges are dismissed, rejecting the argument that the right persists indefinitely after a grand jury no-bill. The Court clarified that its prior …

Fourth Circuit Holds Officer’s Firearms Questioning at Outset of Traffic Stop Exceeded Permissible Scope Where Officer Abandoned Stop’s Purpose From Inception and Totality of Circumstances Did Not Support Officer-Safety Justification

by David Kim

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed the denial of a defendant’s motion to suppress and vacated his guilty plea, holding that a U.S. Forest Service officer exceeded the permissible scope of a traffic stop by abandoning the stop’s stated purpose …

California Supreme Court Announces § 189(e)(2) Requires Nonkiller to Aid the Actual Killer in the Lethal Act, Resolving Appellate Split

by David Kim

The Supreme Court of California held that Penal Code § 189, subdivision (e)(2) requires a nonkiller participant in a qualifying felony to have aided or abetted the actual killer in the lethal act itself. Proof of aiding the underlying felony alone is insufficient to sustain …

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Announces That Warrantless-Arrest Statutes Conditioning Authority on an Offense Within an Officer’s “Presence or View” Require Actual Contemporaneous Sensory Perception

by David Kim

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals held that the “presence or view” language found in multiple warrantless-arrest statutes requires an officer to actually perceive the offense through his or her senses, and an officer who arrives at a crash scene 40 minutes after the fact …

Louisiana Supreme Court Announces Strickland Governs Collateral Claims That Defense Counsel Prevented Defendant From Testifying

by David Kim

The Supreme Court of Louisiana held that when a defendant on collateral review alleges defense counsel prevented him from testifying, the claim must be evaluated under the two-prong standard set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), requiring proof of deficient performance and …

Connecticut Supreme Court Announces Extension of Brady Obligations to Same-Office Impeachment Evidence

by David Kim

The Supreme Court of Connecticut unanimously held that a prosecutor’s Brady obligations may extend to impeachment information about a State witness known within the same State’s Attorney’s Office, even when it arose in an unrelated case. The Court rejected the Appellate Court’s conclusion that the …

 

 

Prisoner Education Guide side
PLN Subscribe Now Ad 450x450
The Habeas Citebook: Prosecutorial Misconduct Side