Skip navigation
Disciplinary Self-Help Litigation Manual - Header

Articles by David Kim

Second Circuit Clarifies Limits on Sentencing Court’s Use of Unrelated Co-Defendant Conduct as § 3553(a) “Context”

by David Kim

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated the defendant’s sentence and remanded for full resentencing following his guilty plea to illegal receipt of a trafficked firearm, holding that the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut committed plain error by …

Ninth Circuit Announces Remmer Presumption of Prejudice Governs When Racially Biased Juror Participates in Deliberations but Is Excused Before Trial Court Accepts Verdict

by David Kim

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that when the presence of a racially biased juror is discovered, or a juror is found to have made a racially biased statement, but the juror is excused before the trial court accepts a …

California Supreme Court Announces Failure to Challenge Ambiguous Jury Instructions on Imputed Malice in a Prior Direct Appeal Does Not Categorically Bar Resentencing Relief Under Penal Code § 1172.6

by David Kim

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court of California held that Penal Code § 1172.6, subdivision (a)(3), which requires resentencing petitioners to allege they “could not presently be convicted of murder or attempted murder because of changes to Section 188 or 189 made effective January …

South Carolina Supreme Court Announces Penile Plethysmograph Results Are Inadmissible Until Underlying Science Becomes Standardized, Affirming Reversal of Sexually Violent Predator Commitment

by David Kim

The Supreme Court of South Carolina unanimously held that results of the penile plethysmography test (“PPG”) are inadmissible in judicial proceedings “unless and until the science underlying the PPG becomes more fully developed and uniform,” reasoning that the pervasive lack of standardization in administering and …

New Jersey Supreme Court Announces Historical CSLI Must Be Presented Through Expert Testimony, Rejecting Lay Mapping of Cell-Tower Locations Because Interpreting CSLI Requires Technical and Specialized Knowledge Beyond “Ken” of Average Juror

by David Kim

The Supreme Court of New Jersey unanimously held that historical cell site location information (“CSLI”) may not be presented to a jury through a lay witness. Instead, because CSLI carries probative force only when the jury understands how cell towers and cellphones interact, the Court …

Chronotype Mismatch as an Emerging Vulnerability Factor in Custodial Confessions

by David Kim

A man is arrested late on a Friday night and held overnight. By morning, detectives are ready to talk. He slept a few hours in the holding cell. He has not been awake for 24 straight hours. No one denied him food or water. At …

Oregon Supreme Court Announces Trial Courts Must Give Complete Oral Final Jury Instructions at Conclusion of Trial, Preliminary Instructions Cannot Substitute for the ORCP 59 B Charge

by David Kim

The Supreme Court of Oregon, sitting en banc, held that Oregon Rule of Civil Procedure (“ORCP”) 59 B, which applies in criminal cases through ORS 136.330, requires a trial court, at the conclusion of trial and before the jury retires to deliberate, to orally state …

Colorado Supreme Court Holds Prosecutor’s Interlocutory Appeal of Evidentiary Ruling Lacked Arguable Merit, Did Not Toll Speedy Trial Deadline, and Violated Defendant’s Right to Speedy Trial

by David Kim

The Supreme Court of Colorado, sitting en banc, unanimously held that the prosecution’s second pretrial appeal, challenging a county court evidentiary ruling under CRE 401, 402, and 403, did not qualify as an “interlocutory appeal” under Colorado’s speedy trial statute because the prosecution’s assertion that …

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Holds Grand Jury No-Bill Terminated Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel, Clarifies Frye Exception

by David Kim

The Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas reversed a suppression order and held that a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel terminates when charges are dismissed, rejecting the argument that the right persists indefinitely after a grand jury no-bill. The Court clarified that its prior …

Fourth Circuit Holds Officer’s Firearms Questioning at Outset of Traffic Stop Exceeded Permissible Scope Where Officer Abandoned Stop’s Purpose From Inception and Totality of Circumstances Did Not Support Officer-Safety Justification

by David Kim

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed the denial of a defendant’s motion to suppress and vacated his guilty plea, holding that a U.S. Forest Service officer exceeded the permissible scope of a traffic stop by abandoning the stop’s stated purpose …

 

 

The Habeas Citebook Ineffective Counsel Side
PLN Subscribe Now Ad 450x450
Prisoner Education Guide side