Skip navigation
PYHS - Header

Articles by David Reutter

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Holds Motion Judge Abused Discretion by Denying Evidentiary Hearing on IAC Claim Where Plea Counsel’s Affidavit Was Not Inherently Inconsistent With Colloquy Statements Regarding Immigration Advice

by David M. Reutter

The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts held that a motion judge abused his discretion by denying an evidentiary hearing on a defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea based on ineffective assistance of counsel. The defendant, a lawful permanent resident facing virtually mandatory removal …

Washington Supreme Court Clarifies Double Jeopardy Analysis for Multiple Assault Convictions, Holding That Assaultive Acts Occurring Over Short Time Period in Same Location Without Intervening Events Constitute Single Course of Conduct

by David M. Reutter

In an en banc decision, the Supreme Court of Washington held that Anthony Lee’s two second-degree assault convictions based on his beating Amy Groff in the head with a gun and then shooting at her as she fled were part of a single unit …

New Jersey Supreme Court Reverses Drug Convictions Under Cumulative Error Doctrine, Holding Combined Effect of Improper References to Television Series, Gun Violence, and Search Warrants Deprived Defendant of Fair Trial

by David M. Reutter

The Supreme Court of New Jersey unanimously reversed the defendant’s controlled dangerous substances (“CDS”) convictions and ordered a new trial, holding that while no individual error warranted reversal, the cumulative effect of multiple prosecutorial missteps deprived the defendant of his constitutional right to a …

New York Court of Appeals Announces Coercive Police Tactics Compelling Suspect to Exit Home Constitute “Constructive Entry” Violating Payton, Holds Attenuation Analysis Applies to Third-Party Consent

by David M. Reutter

The New York Court of Appeals held that when police employ coercive tactics compelling a suspect to leave a residence, the resulting arrest violates the ban on unwarranted in-home arrests established in Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980), under a theory of …

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Revocation Appeal Provides “Procedurally Appropriate Mechanism” for Raising Rogers Challenge to Unannounced Supervised Release Conditions, Vacates Revocation Judgment Based on Null Standard Conditions

by David M. Reutter

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit vacated a supervised release revocation judgment and remanded for resentencing, holding that a defendant may challenge standard conditions of supervised release that were never orally pronounced at sentencing through an appeal of a subsequent …

The Malleable Mind in the Courtroom: Why Confident Eyewitnesses Often Provide the Least Reliable Evidence

by David M. Reutter

“Remembrance of things past is not necessarily the remembrance of things as they were.”

– Marcel Proust

When jurors weigh evidence in a criminal trial, few types of evidence are more persuasive than a witness pointing across a courtroom and declaring with …

First Circuit: Prosecutor’s Breach of Plea Agreement 
Requires Government’s Specific Performance of Agreement, 
Not Specific Performance by District Court

The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit vacated a defendant’s sentence due to the prosecutor’s breach of the parties’ plea agreement, and the Court ordered resentencing before a different judge.

Before the Court was the appeal of Hector Maldonado-Maldonado, who along with one of his …

Fourth Circuit: District Court Failed to Provide Sufficient Explanation for Sentence Imposed and Did Not Address Defendant’s Arguments for Downward Variant Sentence

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina committed procedural error by failing to address the defendant’s arguments for a lower sentence and failing to provide an individualized explanation for the sentence it imposed because …

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Announces Order of Deferred Disposition Not a ‘Sentence’ Under Article 44.01(b)—Which Authorizes State to Appeal Illegal Sentence—Resolving Split Among State Courts of Appeals

by David M. Reutter

The Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas held that a deferred disposition or adjudication is not a “sentence” within the meaning of an authorized appeal by the State under Tex. Crim. Code Proc. art. 44.01(b). The Court resolved a statewide split among the state’s …

Fifth Circuit: Sentence Enhancement for Maintaining Drug Premises Not Satisfied Solely by Defendant’s Single, Conclusory Statement That He ‘Maintained’ Premises When Record Shows Mere ‘Use’ of Premises

by David M. Reutter

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana erred in applying an offense-level enhancement for maintaining a premises for the purposes of manufacturing or distributing a controlled substance based solely …

 

 

Prison Profiteers - Side
Advertise Here 4th Ad
Prison Profiteers - Side