Skip navigation
The Habeas Citebook: Prosecutorial Misconduct - Header

Articles by David Reutter

Sixth Circuit Announces State-Law Exceptions to Appeal Deadlines Preserve “Pending” Status Under AEDPA, Holding Belated-Appeal Procedures Toll Federal Habeas Limitations Period

by David M. Reutter

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that when a state prisoner’s belated appeal fits within an established state-law exception to an otherwise applicable appeal deadline, the prisoner’s properly filed application for post-conviction relief remains “pending” under 28 U.S.C. § …

Florida Supreme Court Announces Rule 3.170(f)’s Good-Cause Plea-Withdrawal Standard Does Not Apply at Post-Appeal Resentencing

by David M. Reutter

In a unanimous decision resolving a certified conflict between the Second and Fourth District Courts of Appeal, the Supreme Court of Florida held that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(f) does not permit a defendant to withdraw a plea on the basis of good …

Colorado Supreme Court Announces Defendant Must Be Competent Before Undergoing Mental-Condition Examination Under § 16-8-107(3)(b)

by David M. Reutter

Sitting en banc, the Supreme Court of Colorado held that a defendant must be competent before undergoing a mental-condition examination under C.R.S. § 16-8-107(3)(b) and that a trial court may not exclude expert mental-condition testimony based on a defendant’s failure to cooperate with such …

California Court of Appeal Announces Plea Agreements Cannot Bar § 1172.1 Resentencing, Holds Merit-Based Denial of Petition Is Appealable

by David M. Reutter

The California Court of Appeal, Second District, unanimously held that a superior court’s order denying a defendant’s petition for recall and resentencing under Penal Code § 1172.1 is appealable when the court substantively evaluates the petition on its merits rather than summarily declining to …

Georgia Supreme Court Clarifies That Failure to Object to Ineligible Juror Does Not Constitute Waiver Unless Party Knew or Could Have Discovered Ineligibility Through Ordinary Diligence

by David M. Reutter

The Supreme Court of Georgia ­vacated the denial of a motion for new trial and remanded for further proceedings, holding that a trial court errs when it concludes a defendant waived an objection to an ineligible juror based solely on the failure to object …

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Holds Motion Judge Abused Discretion by Denying Evidentiary Hearing on IAC Claim Where Plea Counsel’s Affidavit Was Not Inherently Inconsistent With Colloquy Statements Regarding Immigration Advice

by David M. Reutter

The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts held that a motion judge abused his discretion by denying an evidentiary hearing on a defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea based on ineffective assistance of counsel. The defendant, a lawful permanent resident facing virtually mandatory removal …

Washington Supreme Court Clarifies Double Jeopardy Analysis for Multiple Assault Convictions, Holding That Assaultive Acts Occurring Over Short Time Period in Same Location Without Intervening Events Constitute Single Course of Conduct

by David M. Reutter

In an en banc decision, the Supreme Court of Washington held that Anthony Lee’s two second-degree assault convictions based on his beating Amy Groff in the head with a gun and then shooting at her as she fled were part of a single unit …

New Jersey Supreme Court Reverses Drug Convictions Under Cumulative Error Doctrine, Holding Combined Effect of Improper References to Television Series, Gun Violence, and Search Warrants Deprived Defendant of Fair Trial

by David M. Reutter

The Supreme Court of New Jersey unanimously reversed the defendant’s controlled dangerous substances (“CDS”) convictions and ordered a new trial, holding that while no individual error warranted reversal, the cumulative effect of multiple prosecutorial missteps deprived the defendant of his constitutional right to a …

New York Court of Appeals Announces Coercive Police Tactics Compelling Suspect to Exit Home Constitute “Constructive Entry” Violating Payton, Holds Attenuation Analysis Applies to Third-Party Consent

by David M. Reutter

The New York Court of Appeals held that when police employ coercive tactics compelling a suspect to leave a residence, the resulting arrest violates the ban on unwarranted in-home arrests established in Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573 (1980), under a theory of …

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Revocation Appeal Provides “Procedurally Appropriate Mechanism” for Raising Rogers Challenge to Unannounced Supervised Release Conditions, Vacates Revocation Judgment Based on Null Standard Conditions

by David M. Reutter

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit vacated a supervised release revocation judgment and remanded for resentencing, holding that a defendant may challenge standard conditions of supervised release that were never orally pronounced at sentencing through an appeal of a subsequent …

 

 

Federal Prison Handbook - Side
CLN Subscribe Now Ad
The Habeas Citebook: Prosecutorial Misconduct Side