Skip navigation
Chris_Cobb_Blueprint_Book

Articles by Douglas Ankney

Fifth Circuit Announces Enhanced Supervised Release Provision Under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(k) Does Not Apply to Assimilative Crimes Act Offenses, Limiting Statutory Maximum to Five Years Under § 3583(b)

by Douglas Ankney

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held as an issue of first impression that offenses prosecuted under the Assimilative Crimes Act (“ACA”), 18 U.S.C. § 13, are not subject to the enhanced supervised release terms established by 18 U.S.C. § 3583(k) …

California Court of Appeal: Vehicle Impoundment Solely to Prevent Further Unlicensed Driving Does Not Satisfy Fourth Amendment’s Community Caretaking Exception; Statutory Authorization Alone Insufficient to Establish Constitutional Reasonableness

by Douglas Ankney

The Court of Appeal of California, Sixth District, held that a police officer’s decision to impound a vehicle pursuant to the Vehicle Code solely to prevent the driver from continuing to drive on a suspended license does not satisfy the community caretaking function required under …

Sixth Circuit Announces Predetermining a Supervisee’s Revocation Term of Imprisonment at an Earlier Violation Hearing Renders the Resulting Sentence Both Procedurally and Substantively Unreasonable

by Douglas Ankney

In a unanimous opinion, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that when a District Court predetermines a supervisee’s revocation term of imprisonment at an earlier violation hearing, by committing in advance to impose a specified sentence for any future violation, …

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Announces Totality-of-the-Circumstances Framework for Evaluating Delayed Traffic Stops Under Article 14, Holding 24-Hour Gap Between Observed Infraction and Vehicle Stop Was Unreasonable

by Douglas Ankney

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts held that a motor vehicle stop conducted 24 hours after an officer witnessed a civil traffic infraction violated art. 14 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights. Addressing a question of first impression, the Court adopted …

Fourth Circuit Announces ICE’s Execution of a Removal Warrant Following a Final Removal Order Does Not Constitute a “Pending Proceeding” Under 18 U.S.C. § 1505, Vacating Noncitizen’s Obstruction Conviction in Issue of First Impression

by Douglas Ankney

In an issue of first impression, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (“ICE”) execution of a removal warrant following a final order entered by the Executive Office for Immigration Review (“EOIR”) does not qualify as …

Fourth Circuit Announces Defendant Has Standing to Appeal Based Solely on Rogers–Singletary Claim of a “Material Discrepancy Between” Written and Orally Articulated Judgment at Sentencing

by Douglas Ankney

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit vacated a defendant’s sentence and remanded for resentencing after concluding that the warrantless-search condition in the written judgment materially differed from what the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina orally announced …

Sixth Circuit Announces Federal Coercion and Enticement Statute Requires Knowledge of Victim’s Minor Status, Deepening Circuit Split

by Douglas Ankney

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), the federal coercion and enticement statute, requires a defendant to know that the victim is a minor. Applying this interpretation, the Court ruled that Florida lewd and lascivious battery, …

Delaware Supreme Court Announces Adoption of ABA Standard 3-6.5(b) Governing Prosecutors’ Opening Statements, Reverses Murder Convictions Based on Prosecutor’s References to Co-Defendant’s Guilty Plea

by Douglas Ankney

The Supreme Court of Delaware, sitting en banc, reversed Yony Morales-Garcia’s convictions and remanded for a new trial, holding that the State committed plain error when it repeatedly referred to his brother and co-defendant’s guilty plea during trial. The Court concluded that the prosecutor’s opening-statement …

Tenth Circuit Holds Prior California Child Pornography Conviction Does Not Trigger Federal Mandatory Minimum Because State Statute Encompasses Conduct Beyond Federal Definition Under Categorical Approach

by Douglas Ankney

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacated a defendant’s 10-year mandatory minimum sentence, holding that his prior conviction under California Penal Code § 311.11 did not qualify as a predicate offense under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(b)(2). Applying the categorical approach, the …

Kentucky Supreme Court Clarifies Parole Board May Delegate Final Revocation Hearings to Administrative Law Judges but Holds Due Process Requires Parolees Be Permitted to File Exceptions to ALJ Findings Before Board Renders a Final Revocation Decision

by Douglas Ankney

Consolidating two appeals that had produced conflicting results in the Court of Appeals, the en banc Supreme Court of Kentucky held that the Kentucky Parole Board possesses both constitutional and statutory authority to delegate the conduct of final parole revocation hearings to Administrative Law Judges …

 

 

Prison Phone Justice Campaign
Advertise Here 4th Ad
Prison Phone Justice Campaign