Skip navigation
The Habeas Citebook: Prosecutorial Misconduct - Header

Articles by Douglas Ankney

California Court of Appeal Announces Defendants Who Exercise Right to Jury Trial on Aggravating Circumstances Are Entitled to Closing Argument by Counsel on Those Factors

by Douglas Ankney

In a matter of first impression, the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, held that a trial court must permit a defendant who exercises the right to a jury trial on aggravating circumstances under Penal Code § 1170(b)(2) the opportunity to argue to the …

SCOTUS Holds Federal Habeas Court May Not Consider Post-Trial DNA Evidence That Was Never Presented to Jury When Assessing Whether False Informant Testimony Influenced Verdict

by Douglas Ankney

In a per curiam opinion, the Supreme Court of the United States vacated the judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirming the denial of federal habeas relief to Florida death row prisoner Gary Richard Whitton, holding that the Court of …

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia Announces Six-Factor Test for Evaluating Presentence Motions to Withdraw Guilty Pleas Under Rule 32(e), Holds Binding Plea Agreement Does Not Extinguish Defendant’s Ability to Seek Withdrawal

by Douglas Ankney

The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia vacated a circuit court order that accepted a defendant’s 20-year-old guilty plea and imposed sentence under a binding plea agreement, holding that the circuit court erred by concluding the agreement’s binding nature eliminated its discretion to allow …

California Supreme Court Announces Amended § 1170(b) Applies Retroactively to Plea-Bargained Upper Term Sentences

by Douglas Ankney

In resolving a split among the Courts of Appeal, the Supreme Court of California unanimously held that defendants who agreed to upper term sentences as part of plea bargains may seek the retroactive benefit of amended Penal Code § 1170, subdivision (b), which requires that …

Michigan Supreme Court Announces Betts Decision Invalidating 2011 SORA as Ex Post Facto Punishment Applies Retroactively to Defendants on Collateral Review

by Douglas Ankney

The Supreme Court of Michigan unanimously held that its prior decision in People v. Betts, 968 N.W.2d 497 (Mich. 2021), applies retroactively to defendants seeking relief on collateral review under both federal and state constitutional law. Betts declared the 2011 version of Michigan’s Sex Offenders …

South Carolina Supreme Court Announces Formal Adoption of Fourth Circuit’s Three-Step Cheek Framework for Evaluating Improper Third-Party Contacts With Jurors Under Remmer, Reverses Murdaugh Murder Convictions, and Overrules Ethier Regarding Juror Testim

by Douglas Ankney

The Supreme Court of South Carolina unanimously reversed the denial of Richard Alexander Murdaugh’s motion for a new trial and remanded for a new trial after his convictions for murdering his wife and son and for two weapons offenses, holding that improper communications by Colleton …

Fifth Circuit Announces Enhanced Supervised Release Provision Under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(k) Does Not Apply to Assimilative Crimes Act Offenses, Limiting Statutory Maximum to Five Years Under § 3583(b)

by Douglas Ankney

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held as an issue of first impression that offenses prosecuted under the Assimilative Crimes Act (“ACA”), 18 U.S.C. § 13, are not subject to the enhanced supervised release terms established by 18 U.S.C. § 3583(k) …

California Court of Appeal: Vehicle Impoundment Solely to Prevent Further Unlicensed Driving Does Not Satisfy Fourth Amendment’s Community Caretaking Exception; Statutory Authorization Alone Insufficient to Establish Constitutional Reasonableness

by Douglas Ankney

The Court of Appeal of California, Sixth District, held that a police officer’s decision to impound a vehicle pursuant to the Vehicle Code solely to prevent the driver from continuing to drive on a suspended license does not satisfy the community caretaking function required under …

Sixth Circuit Announces Predetermining a Supervisee’s Revocation Term of Imprisonment at an Earlier Violation Hearing Renders the Resulting Sentence Both Procedurally and Substantively Unreasonable

by Douglas Ankney

In a unanimous opinion, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that when a District Court predetermines a supervisee’s revocation term of imprisonment at an earlier violation hearing, by committing in advance to impose a specified sentence for any future violation, …

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Announces Totality-of-the-Circumstances Framework for Evaluating Delayed Traffic Stops Under Article 14, Holding 24-Hour Gap Between Observed Infraction and Vehicle Stop Was Unreasonable

by Douglas Ankney

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts held that a motor vehicle stop conducted 24 hours after an officer witnessed a civil traffic infraction violated art. 14 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights. Addressing a question of first impression, the Court adopted …

 

 

Federal Prison Handbook - Side
Advertise Here 4th Ad
Federal Prison Handbook - Side