Skip navigation
PYHS - Header

Articles by Douglas Ankney

Fourth Circuit Announces Defendant Has Standing to Appeal Based Solely on Rogers–Singletary Claim of a “Material Discrepancy Between” Written and Orally Articulated Judgment at Sentencing

by Douglas Ankney

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit vacated a defendant’s sentence and remanded for resentencing after concluding that the warrantless-search condition in the written judgment materially differed from what the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina orally announced …

Sixth Circuit Announces Federal Coercion and Enticement Statute Requires Knowledge of Victim’s Minor Status, Deepening Circuit Split

by Douglas Ankney

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), the federal coercion and enticement statute, requires a defendant to know that the victim is a minor. Applying this interpretation, the Court ruled that Florida lewd and lascivious battery, …

Delaware Supreme Court Announces Adoption of ABA Standard 3-6.5(b) Governing Prosecutors’ Opening Statements, Reverses Murder Convictions Based on Prosecutor’s References to Co-Defendant’s Guilty Plea

by Douglas Ankney

The Supreme Court of Delaware, sitting en banc, reversed Yony Morales-Garcia’s convictions and remanded for a new trial, holding that the State committed plain error when it repeatedly referred to his brother and co-defendant’s guilty plea during trial. The Court concluded that the prosecutor’s opening-statement …

Tenth Circuit Holds Prior California Child Pornography Conviction Does Not Trigger Federal Mandatory Minimum Because State Statute Encompasses Conduct Beyond Federal Definition Under Categorical Approach

by Douglas Ankney

The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacated a defendant’s 10-year mandatory minimum sentence, holding that his prior conviction under California Penal Code § 311.11 did not qualify as a predicate offense under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(b)(2). Applying the categorical approach, the …

Kentucky Supreme Court Clarifies Parole Board May Delegate Final Revocation Hearings to Administrative Law Judges but Holds Due Process Requires Parolees Be Permitted to File Exceptions to ALJ Findings Before Board Renders a Final Revocation Decision

by Douglas Ankney

Consolidating two appeals that had produced conflicting results in the Court of Appeals, the en banc Supreme Court of Kentucky held that the Kentucky Parole Board possesses both constitutional and statutory authority to delegate the conduct of final parole revocation hearings to Administrative Law Judges …

New York Court of Appeals Holds Generic Physical Description Insufficient to Justify Pursuit in Mistaken Identity Case, and Suspect’s Flight Cannot Support Reasonable Suspicion Absent Evidence He Knew He Was Fleeing Law Enforcement

by Douglas Ankey

T

he New York Court of Appeals held that parole investigators unlawfully pursued and arrested the defendant after mistakenly believing he was a parole absconder. The Court concluded that the pursuit was unjustified for two reasons: …

Montana Supreme Court Holds Defendant’s Sentence Must Be Vacated Where District Court Premised Sentence on Defendant’s Exercise of Constitutional Rights to Jury Trial, Silence, and Against Self-Incrimination

by Douglas Ankney

The Supreme Court of Montana unanimously held that a district court violates due process when it premises a criminal sentence on a defendant’s decision to exercise constitutional rights, including the right to a jury trial, the right to remain silent, and the right against self-incrimination. …

Fifth Circuit Holds Texas Sexual Assault of a Child Statute Sweeps More Broadly Than Federal SORNA Tier Offenses

by Doug Ankney

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated a defendant’s sentence for failing to register as a sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”), holding that the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas committed plain …

Delaware Supreme Court Announces Four-Part Plain Error Framework, Aligning Prejudice Standard With Federal Approach Requiring Reasonable Probability of Different Outcome

by Doug Ankney

Sitting en banc, the Supreme Court of Delaware vacated the defendant’s convictions and remanded, holding that the prosecution’s use of indirect hearsay evidence violated his Sixth Amendment confrontation rights. Although defense counsel did not object at trial, the Court applied plain error review and determined …

Acquitted Conduct Sentencing: Not Guilty – But Punished Anyway

by Douglas Ankney

When Pontius Pilate declared he found “no fault” in the man before him, he sent Jesus to be crucified anyway. Two thousand years later, a version of this practice persists in America’s federal courts. It is called “acquitted conduct sentencing,” and it permits judges to …

 

 

Prisoner Education Guide side
Advertise Here 2nd Ad
Federal Prison Handbook - Side