Skip navigation
Prison Profiteers - Header

Articles by Douglas Ankney

Second Circuit Vacates Above-Guidelines Firearm-Trafficking Sentence Based on Failure to Assist Law Enforcement and Unexplained Reliance on Factors Already Included in Guidelines Range

by Douglas Ankney

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut plainly erred by increasing the defendant’s sentence, partly for not helping recover trafficked firearms and by invoking three circumstances used to calculate the Guidelines …

Ninth Circuit Reverses Convictions, Holding Requirement That Defendant Testify Before Displaying Hand Tattoos Violates Fifth Amendment

by Douglas Ankney

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the defendant’s Hobbs Act robbery and firearm-brandishing convictions and remanded for a new trial. The Court held that conditioning jury inspection of the tattoos on Valencia’s hands on his testimony infringed the Fifth Amendment …

Ohio Supreme Court Announces Postconviction DNA-Testing Orders Need Only Identify Statutory Reason to Satisfy R.C. 2953.73(D) “Reasons” Requirement

by Douglas Ankney

The Supreme Court of Ohio held that R.C. 2953.73(D) is satisfied when a postconviction DNA-testing order identifies the statutory ground supporting acceptance or rejection. The statute does not additionally demand factual findings or an explanation of the trial court’s analysis. Because the order invoked the …

New Jersey Supreme Court Orders Plenary Hearing Before Special Adjudicator on Reliability of Fingerprint Evidence, Holding Century of Judicial Acceptance Did Not Satisfy Trial Court’s Gatekeeping Obligation Under N.J.R.E. 702

by Douglas Ankney

The Supreme Court of New Jersey unanimously held that a trial court confronted with a substantive challenge to expert fingerprint testimony must assess the evidence’s reliability before admitting it and may not discharge its gatekeeping obligation by relying on a century of judicial acceptance. Because …

En Banc Eleventh Circuit Announces All Parents, Including Those Convicted of Child-Sex Offenses, Enjoy Fundamental Right to Live With Their Children, Holding Alabama Residency Prohibition Subject to Strict Scrutiny

by Douglas Ankney

Sitting en banc, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that all parents, including a parent convicted of possessing child pornography, enjoy a fundamental right under the Fourteenth Amendment to live with their children so that legislation burdening that right is …

Seventh Circuit Announces Courts May Examine Individual Officer’s Subjective Purpose When Assessing Whether Warrantless Administrative Inspection Was Pretextual, Holding Suppression Required Where Trooper’s Sole Motive for Stop Was Criminal Investigati

by Douglas Ankney

The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that a court may examine an individual officer’s subjective purpose in assessing whether a warrantless administrative inspection was a pretext for a criminal investigation, rejecting the Government’s contention that such inquiries are confined to …

SCOTUS Holds § 922(g)(3) Prosecution Based Solely on Regular Marijuana Use, Without Individualized Proof of Dangerousness, Violates Second Amendment

by Douglas Ankney

The Supreme Court of the United States held that the Government’s prosecution of Ali Danial Hemani under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), based solely on his regular marijuana use and without individualized proof that his use rendered him dangerous, is inconsistent with the Second Amendment. Under …

California Court of Appeal Announces Defendants Who Exercise Right to Jury Trial on Aggravating Circumstances Are Entitled to Closing Argument by Counsel on Those Factors

by Douglas Ankney

In a matter of first impression, the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, held that a trial court must permit a defendant who exercises the right to a jury trial on aggravating circumstances under Penal Code § 1170(b)(2) the opportunity to argue to the …

SCOTUS Holds Federal Habeas Court May Not Consider Post-Trial DNA Evidence That Was Never Presented to Jury When Assessing Whether False Informant Testimony Influenced Verdict

by Douglas Ankney

In a per curiam opinion, the Supreme Court of the United States vacated the judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirming the denial of federal habeas relief to Florida death row prisoner Gary Richard Whitton, holding that the Court of …

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia Announces Six-Factor Test for Evaluating Presentence Motions to Withdraw Guilty Pleas Under Rule 32(e), Holds Binding Plea Agreement Does Not Extinguish Defendant’s Ability to Seek Withdrawal

by Douglas Ankney

The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia vacated a circuit court order that accepted a defendant’s 20-year-old guilty plea and imposed sentence under a binding plea agreement, holding that the circuit court erred by concluding the agreement’s binding nature eliminated its discretion to allow …

 

 

Disciplinary Self-Help Litigation Manual - Side
Advertise Here 2nd Ad
Prisoner Education Guide side