×
You've used up your 3 free articles for this month. Subscribe today.
Maryland Supreme Court Clarifies Process for Admitting Co-Conspirator’s Hearsay Statements During Police Interview Under ‘Declaration Against Penal Interest’ Exception, Trial Court Must ‘Parse’ Interview to Determine Admissibility of Each Statement
Loaded on Feb. 1, 2025
by Sam Rutherford
published in Criminal Legal News
February, 2025, page 10
Filed under:
Standard of Review,
Police Interrogations,
Evidence - Admissibility,
Hearsay Evidence,
Co-conspirator Statements.
Location:
Maryland.
by Sam Rutherford
The Supreme Court of Maryland clarified the process a trial court must follow when determining whether statements made by a non-testifying co-conspirator defendant during a lengthy police interview are admissible as statements against penal interest at the trial of a co-defendant. The Court clarified that the duty ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Criminal Legal News, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- California Court of Appeal Announces Youthful Defendants Sentenced to Terms ‘Functionally Equivalent’ to LWOP Entitled to Resentencing Under § 1170(d), by Sam Rutherford
- Maryland Supreme Court Clarifies Process for Admitting Co-Conspirator’s Hearsay Statements During Police Interview Under ‘Declaration Against Penal Interest’ Exception, Trial Court Must ‘Parse’ Interview to Determine Admissibility of Each Statement, by Sam Rutherford
- Federal Habeas Corpus for State Prisoners: Proving Unreasonableness Under AEDPA, by Dale Chappell
- Ninth Circuit Announces ‘Hate Crime’ Sentence Enhancement Under Guidelines § 3A1.1(a) Requires Finding Defendant Motivated by Hate or Animus, by Sam Rutherford
- Surveilling the Harms of Electronic Monitors, by Michael Thompson
- The Murky Waters of Parole, by David Reutter
- Study Highlights Limitations in Forensic DNA Analysis Involving Lower Genetic Diversity Groups, by Jo Ellen Nott
- Careful What You Search For, by Michael Thompson
- Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Clarifies Trial Court Must Conduct Inquiry Whether Defendant Knowingly and Voluntarily Waived Right to Counsel at ‘Any Stage of a Case,’ Including Arraignment or Plea Hearing, by Sam Rutherford
- Ninth Circuit: Defense Counsel Ineffective for Failing to Move to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of Police Officer Trespassing on Curtilage of Defendant’s Home, by Sam Rutherford
- Ninth Circuit Announces California Assault With Deadly Weapon Conviction Not ‘Crime of Violence’ for Career Offender Enhancement Under Sentencing Guidelines, by Sam Rutherford
- New AI Tool Harnesses Microbiomes for Forensic and Medical Breakthroughs, by Jo Ellen Nott
- California Court of Appeal Strikes Prison Prior Enhancement for Invalid Predicate Offense Under § 1172.75 Despite Concurrently Served Valid Predicate, by Sam Rutherford
- Illinois Supreme Court Announces Odor of Burnt Cannabis Alone Is Insufficient to Establish Probable Cause for a Warrantless Vehicle Search, by Anthony Accurso
- First Step Act Linked to Modest Reductions in Time Served by Federal Prisoners, by Jo Ellen Nott
- Eleventh Circuit: Asylee’s Florida Convictions for Marijuana Possession and Lewd and Lascivious Battery Do Not Warrant Removal Under INA, by Sam Rutherford
- Minnesota Supreme Court Announces No Duty to Retreat When Using Reasonable Force in Defense of Another and Provides Framework for Analyzing Such Claims, by Douglas Ankney
- Mass Spectrometry Being Studied as Way to Analyze Overlapping or Weak Fingerprints, by Anthony Accurso
- Vermont Supreme Court Eliminates Year-and-a-Day Rule in Murder Prosecutions, by Sam Rutherford
- Chicago’s Police Body Cam Transparency, by Michael Thompson
- Ninth Circuit Announces ‘Clear Error’ Review Applies to District Courts’ Factual Findings for Brady Challenges and Affirms District Court’s Mid-Trial Order Excluding Witness Testimony and Imposing Monetary Sanctions for Government’s Brady Violation, by Sam Rutherford
- Federal Facial Recognition Technology Fails Again, by Michael Thompson
- Colorado Bureau of Investigation Admits Over 1,000 Cases Affected by DNA Test Misconduct, by James Mills
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Grants Habeas Relief in ‘Shaken Baby Syndrome’ Case, by Sam Rutherford
- News in Brief
- Seeking Justice for Two: The DNA Scandal That Shook a Community
More from Sam Rutherford:
- Ninth and Tenth Circuits Find Bivens Extension Orders Not Immediately Appealable, March 1, 2025
- New Mexico Corrections Department Continues Pattern of Abuse With Contract Medical Provider Wexford Health Sources, Feb. 15, 2025
- Hawai’i Supreme Court Reverses Murder Conviction for Prosecutorial Misconduct Based on Prosecution’s Improper Statements During Closing Arguments, Feb. 15, 2025
- Third Circuit Grants Habeas Relief to Prisoner on Confrontation Clause and Ineffective Assistance Claims Based on Trial Court Reading Entire Criminal Information Into the Record of Co-Conspirator Who Pleaded Guilty, Feb. 15, 2025
- Fourth Circuit Decision on Claim of Retaliation for Exercising First And Sixth Amendment Rights Highlights Police Corruption, Feb. 15, 2025
- Washington DOC Physician Assistant Surrenders Medical License in Wake of Malpractice Allegations, Feb. 15, 2025
- California Court of Appeal Announces Defendants May Obtain Brady Evidence From Police Officers’ Personnel Files in Advance of § 1172.6 Hearing Requesting Vacatur of Conviction and Resentencing for Certain Types of Murder Convictions, Feb. 15, 2025
- Massachusetts Supreme Court Vacates Threat-Based Conviction on First Amendment Grounds Because Jury Instructions Failed to Include Mens Rea Element Mandated by Counterman for ‘True-Threat’ Conviction, Feb. 15, 2025
- California Court of Appeal Announces Equal Protection Entitles Youth Offenders Convicted of Special Circumstances Murder Predicated on Robbery or Burglary to Franklin and Parole Hearings Under Cal. Penal Code § 3051, Feb. 15, 2025
- Law Enforcement Obscures Use of Facial Recognition Technology, Feb. 15, 2025
More from these topics:
- California Court of Appeal Announces Defendants May Obtain Brady Evidence From Police Officers’ Personnel Files in Advance of § 1172.6 Hearing Requesting Vacatur of Conviction and Resentencing for Certain Types of Murder Convictions, Feb. 15, 2025. Disclosure of Records, Police, Brady Violations, Murder/Felony Murder, Resentencing, Prior Conviction/Sentence/Incarceration, Evidence - Admissibility.
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Grants Habeas Relief in ‘Shaken Baby Syndrome’ Case, Feb. 1, 2025. junk science, Habeas Corpus, Forensic Sciences, Child Abuse/Abusers, Evidence - Admissibility.
- Ninth Circuit Announces ‘Hate Crime’ Sentence Enhancement Under Guidelines § 3A1.1(a) Requires Finding Defendant Motivated by Hate or Animus, Feb. 1, 2025. Hate Crimes, Sentence Enhancements/Departures, Evidence - Admissibility.
- Eighth Circuit: Evidentiary Admissibility Is a “Red Herring” At Class Certification of St. Louis Jail Conditions Challenge, Jan. 15, 2025. Classification, Conditions of Confinement, Class Certification, Class Actions, Evidence - Admissibility.
- Arkansas Supreme Court Announces Petition for Testing Forensic Evidence Based on Advances in Technology Under Act 1780 of 2001 May Be Filed by Anyone Convicted of a Crime, Not Just Those Still in State Custody, Dec. 1, 2024. Forensic Sciences, Evidence - Admissibility.
- Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Announces Prosecution’s Duty to Provide Discoverable Evidence Upon Request Applies to Discoverable Items in Law Enforcement Agencies’ Possession Unbeknownst to Prosecution and Exclusion Is Appropriate Remedy for Violation, Dec. 1, 2024. Brady Violations, Evidence - Admissibility.
- Washington Appellate Court Reverses Parole Revocation Based on Hearsay, Nov. 15, 2024. Hearsay Evidence, Revocation Proceedings.
- Rhode Island Supreme Court Holds Temporal Requirement of ‘Recent Fabrication’ Exception to Hearsay Rule Not Satisfied and Scribbled Note Made by Child Victim of Sexual Abuse Years After Alleged Events Not ‘Excited Utterance’, Oct. 1, 2024. Sexual Abuse of a Minor, Sexual Abuse - Aggravated, Fabrication of Evidence, Sexual Abuse/Harrassment/Exploitation, Hearsay Evidence.
- First Circuit: Sentencing May Not Be Based Upon Unreliable Hearsay Testimony, Aug. 1, 2024. U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, Unreliable and Unsubstantiated Assertions, Hearsay Evidence.
- Researchers Discover Wire-Cutting Evidence Is Too Unreliable for Court, Aug. 1, 2024. junk science, Forensic Sciences, Evidence - Admissibility.