Skip navigation
Federal Prison Handbook - Header

Criminal Legal News: October, 2026

Issue PDF
Volume 9, Number 10

In this issue:

  1. Formally Available, Rarely Granted: A State Prisoner’s Guide to Federal Habeas Relief (p 1)
  2. Federal Habeas Quick Reference Guide for State Prisoners (p 26)
  3. Tenth Circuit Announces Resentencing After Probation Revocation Must Begin with Chapter 7 Range, Holding Chapter 5 Range Should Be Considered When Deciding Whether to Vary (p 34)
  4. Sixth Circuit Holds Kentucky Deficient-Counsel Belated-Appeal Procedure Tolls Federal Habeas One-Year Limitations Period (p 35)
  5. Hawaii Supreme Court Announces False Evidence Standard Governs Post-Conviction Claims That Scientific Developments Invalidated Expert Testimony, Holding Prosecution Knowledge Not Required Under State Due Process Clause (p 36)
  6. Second Circuit Vacates Above-Guidelines Firearm-Trafficking Sentence Based on Failure to Assist Law Enforcement and Unexplained Reliance on Factors Already Included in Guidelines Range (p 38)
  7. Alaska Supreme Court Announces “Stop and Clarify” Rule Under Article I, Sections 9 and 11 of Alaska Constitution, Holding Officers Must Cease Questioning and Clarify Ambiguous Post-Waiver Request for Counsel (p 40)
  8. Seventh Circuit Announces Generic Conspiracy Under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 Requires Bilateral Agreement, Holding Indiana Conspiracy Convictions Cannot Qualify as Crimes of Violence (p 42)
  9. California Supreme Court Announces Article I, Section 28(f)(3) Does Not Authorize Denial of Bail Beyond Offenses Specified in Section 12, Holding Bail Must Generally Be Set in Amount Reasonably Attainable for Defendant (p 43)
  10. Ninth Circuit Reverses Convictions, Holding Requirement That Defendant Testify Before Displaying Hand Tattoos Violates Fifth Amendment (p 45)
  11. Connecticut Supreme Court Holds Trial Counsel Ineffective for Failing to Challenge Misleading CSLI GeoTime Video (p 46)
  12. Michigan Supreme Court Announces Two-Step Test for Mandatory LWOP Imposed for Pre-Aaron Felony Murder (p 48)
  13. Ohio Supreme Court Announces Postconviction DNA-Testing Orders Need Only Identify Statutory Reason to Satisfy R.C. 2953.73(D) “Reasons” Requirement (p 48)
  14. NEWS IN BRIEF (p 50)

Formally Available, Rarely Granted: A State Prisoner’s Guide to Federal Habeas Relief

An Introduction to the Labyrinth: The Limits of Federal Habeas Relief

Barry Lee Jones was sentenced to death in Arizona in 1995 for the killing of Rachel Gray, his girlfriend’s 4-year-old daughter. Rachel died on the morning of May 2, 1994, of peritonitis, an …

Federal Habeas Quick Reference Guide for State Prisoners

Use Claim by Claim. The sequence is only a roadmap. The barriers are independent and cumulative. Satisfying one does not satisfy another, and passing a procedural gateway does not establish entitlement to relief.

Verify Before Acting. Confirm current statutes, federal and local rules, state procedural law, official forms, …

Tenth Circuit Announces Resentencing After Probation Revocation Must Begin with Chapter 7 Range, Holding Chapter 5 Range Should Be Considered When Deciding Whether to Vary

by David Kim

Sitting en banc, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit held that, after probation revocation, Chapter 7 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines provides the initial advisory range under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(4)(B). The Court abrogated United States v. Moore (“Moore I”), 30 …

Sixth Circuit Holds Kentucky Deficient-Counsel Belated-Appeal Procedure Tolls Federal Habeas One-Year Limitations Period

by David M. Reutter

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that a properly filed Kentucky post-conviction application remains “pending” under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2) during a belated appeal authorized by Kentucky’s deficient-counsel exception. The petitioner requested relief before the one-year period expired, so …

Hawaii Supreme Court Announces False Evidence Standard Governs Post-Conviction Claims That Scientific Developments Invalidated Expert Testimony, Holding Prosecution Knowledge Not Required Under State Due Process Clause

by David Kim

The Supreme Court of Hawaii held that Hawaii Rules of Penal Procedure (“HRPP”) Rule 40 claims based on expert testimony later invalidated by scientific developments are governed by the constitutional false-evidence standard, not the newly discovered evidence test of State v. McNulty, 588 P.2d 438 …

Second Circuit Vacates Above-Guidelines Firearm-Trafficking Sentence Based on Failure to Assist Law Enforcement and Unexplained Reliance on Factors Already Included in Guidelines Range

by Douglas Ankney

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut plainly erred by increasing the defendant’s sentence, partly for not helping recover trafficked firearms and by invoking three circumstances used to calculate the Guidelines …

Alaska Supreme Court Announces “Stop and Clarify” Rule Under Article I, Sections 9 and 11 of Alaska Constitution, Holding Officers Must Cease Questioning and Clarify Ambiguous Post-Waiver Request for Counsel

by David Kim

The Supreme Court of Alaska adopted a “stop and clarify” rule under article I, sections 9 and 11 of the Alaska Constitution, holding that where a suspect has waived Miranda rights and then makes an ambiguous request for counsel, interrogating officers must stop questioning and …

Seventh Circuit Announces Generic Conspiracy Under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 Requires Bilateral Agreement, Holding Indiana Conspiracy Convictions Cannot Qualify as Crimes of Violence

by David M. Reutter

The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that “conspiring” in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 incorporates the generic 1989 definition of conspiracy, which requires genuine agreement by at least two participants. Because Indiana Code § 35-41-5-2 also criminalizes unilateral conspiracy with an …

California Supreme Court Announces Article I, Section 28(f)(3) Does Not Authorize Denial of Bail Beyond Offenses Specified in Section 12, Holding Bail Must Generally Be Set in Amount Reasonably Attainable for Defendant

by David Kim

The Supreme Court of California unanimously held that article I, section 28(f)(3) of the California Constitution does not expand the noncapital offenses for which a trial court may deny pretrial bail beyond those specified in article I, section 12, subdivisions (b) and (c). Answering a …

Ninth Circuit Reverses Convictions, Holding Requirement That Defendant Testify Before Displaying Hand Tattoos Violates Fifth Amendment

by Douglas Ankney

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the defendant’s Hobbs Act robbery and firearm-brandishing convictions and remanded for a new trial. The Court held that conditioning jury inspection of the tattoos on Valencia’s hands on his testimony infringed the Fifth Amendment …

Connecticut Supreme Court Holds Trial Counsel Ineffective for Failing to Challenge Misleading CSLI GeoTime Video

by David Kim

The Supreme Court of Connecticut unanimously held that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance to Tyquan Turner by neither contesting nor meaningfully challenging a GeoTime video that misleadingly used a person-shaped icon to portray Turner’s phone moving among incriminating locations based on historical cell site location …

Michigan Supreme Court Announces Two-Step Test for Mandatory LWOP Imposed for Pre-Aaron Felony Murder

by David Kim

The Supreme Court of Michigan held that mandatory life imprisonment without the possibility of parole (“LWOP”) for a pre-People v. Aaron, 299 N.W.2d 304 (Mich. 1980), felony-murder conviction violates Michigan Constitution, art 1, § 16 when the defendant shows the jury lacked an Aaron-compliant malice …

Ohio Supreme Court Announces Postconviction DNA-Testing Orders Need Only Identify Statutory Reason to Satisfy R.C. 2953.73(D) “Reasons” Requirement

by Douglas Ankney

The Supreme Court of Ohio held that R.C. 2953.73(D) is satisfied when a postconviction DNA-testing order identifies the statutory ground supporting acceptance or rejection. The statute does not additionally demand factual findings or an explanation of the trial court’s analysis. Because the order invoked the …

NEWS IN BRIEF

Arizona: The Phoenix Police Department (PPD) fired and arrested Offs. Luis Vasquez Jr. and Antonio Felix on August 22, 2026, for violently assaulting a couple during a traffic stop, KTVK/KPHO in Phoenix reported. The incident occurred late on the evening of August 5, when the duo pulled over …

 

 

The Habeas Citebook Ineffective Counsel Side
Advertise Here 3rd Ad
The Habeas Citebook: Prosecutorial Misconduct Side